-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support GHC 8.10 #376
Support GHC 8.10 #376
Conversation
CI with 8.10 failed due to haskell-checkers/checkers#44. |
I have lowered the upper bound on Travis should succeed too now: https://travis-ci.org/github/hedgehogqa/haskell-hedgehog/builds/669930888 |
@sjakobi, cool 🍻 I just re-run the AppVeyor build. |
Not sure what's up with AppVeyor… Could you try deleting its cache? |
There is an option "Save build cache in Pull Requests" which is turned off. |
Hm, not sure what to do except try rerunning then. |
The AppVeyor failures look similar to haskell/cabal#4005. How about turning off builds with GHC 8.0? |
OK. AppVeyor and Travis are finally both green now. |
@sjakobi did you use |
Oh no, I wasn't aware of that! It's strange that Why don't you use the more conventional |
The Travis job with GHC 8.0 is failing now because of the combination of I suspect it's a |
I reported the |
I acted on @phadej's excellent advice in haskell-CI/haskell-ci#377 (comment) and improved the Unless haskell-checkers/checkers#44 gets merged very soon, I plan no further changes. ;) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
||
# .travis.yml is generated using the 'haskell-ci' available on Hackage | ||
|
||
haskell-ci regenerate --copy-fields=all |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is haskell-ci --copy-field=all cabal.project
an alternative? If yes, I think it makes sense to remove this (as you did).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed. In general, once the correct incantation is recorded in the comment at the top of the .travis.yml
, haskell-ci regenerate
should be sufficient.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good to know 👍 Yes, as per @phadej in haskell-CI/haskell-ci#377 (comment).
I wasn't aware, thanks for the changes! 🎉 |
Note @erikd has updated the Thanks all 🎉 |
Thanks for the merge! This was a bit of a yak shave! ;) |
No description provided.