Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New Docs PR] - Helidon MP Reactive Messaging #4469

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2022

Conversation

danielkec
Copy link
Contributor

@danielkec danielkec commented Jul 5, 2022

Related to #4215

Signed-off-by: Daniel Kec daniel.kec@oracle.com

@danielkec danielkec self-assigned this Jul 5, 2022
@danielkec danielkec added 3.x Issues for 3.x version branch docs labels Jul 5, 2022
@danielkec danielkec force-pushed the 4215-reactive_docs branch 2 times, most recently from 3d14312 to 6437d44 Compare July 8, 2022 19:19
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kec <daniel.kec@oracle.com>
@danielkec danielkec force-pushed the 4215-reactive_docs branch from 6437d44 to 095ce1f Compare July 9, 2022 19:33
@danielkec danielkec requested a review from ljamen July 9, 2022 19:33
@danielkec danielkec marked this pull request as ready for review July 9, 2022 19:33
@danielkec danielkec added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Jul 12, 2022
@tomas-langer tomas-langer reopened this Jul 14, 2022
@tomas-langer tomas-langer merged commit baac8b1 into helidon-io:master Jul 14, 2022
romain-grecourt pushed a commit to MadsBrun/helidon that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2022
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kec <daniel.kec@oracle.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@ljamen ljamen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comments inline. A couple of questions re: meaning. We will check the headings once we have established the style guide. I did not mark those now.

docs/mp/reactivemessaging/kafka.adoc Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/mp/reactivemessaging/kafka.adoc Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/mp/reactivemessaging/kafka.adoc Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/mp/reactivemessaging/mock.adoc Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/mp/reactivemessaging/mock.adoc Show resolved Hide resolved
Mock connector works great with built-in Helidon test support for
link:/{rootdir}/testing/testing.adoc[JUnit 5] or link:/{rootdir}/testing/testing-ng.adoc[Test NG].

As Helidon test support makes a bean out of your test, you can inject MockConnector right in to it.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mock Connector directly into it or is it MockConnector when referring to the bean?

@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ implicit ack before callback is executed is necessary.

=== Connector
Connector concept is a way for connecting <<Channel,channels>> to external sources.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Connector concept? Does this mean the concept of connecting channels to external sources or could it be "Connectors are used to connect channels to external sources."?

docs/se/reactivemessaging/introduction.adoc Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ implicit ack before callback is executed is necessary.

=== Connector
Connector concept is a way for connecting <<Channel,channels>> to external sources.
To make xref:connector.adoc[creation and usage of connectors]
To make creation and usage of connectors
as easy and versatile as possible, Helidon SE Messaging uses same API for connectors
like xref:../../mp/reactivemessaging/introduction.adoc[MicroProfile Reactive Messaging] does.
This allows connectors to be usable in both flavors of Helidon with one limitation which is
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to be used in both Heldion MP and SE, however it has to be able to work without CDI.

@ljamen ljamen mentioned this pull request Aug 2, 2022
8 tasks
@ljamen
Copy link
Contributor

ljamen commented Aug 11, 2022

@danielkec Hi - I can make these updates in another PR and have you review them. Is that ok? I don't want to conflict with your changes if you've already started?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3.x Issues for 3.x version branch docs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants