-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 409
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Moving Consensus Off Miners (HIP Draft) #97
Conversation
Added discord #hips to the areas of circulation.
initialize template file
summary & motivations
title adjustment
stakeholders
formatting
success metrics
explanation, drawbacks, rationale
rounding off of core skeletal aspects of draft
Update 0007-managing-hip-process.md circulation link
some additional comments on need to resolve earnings impact(s).
my b looks like you had integrated that feedback in another form -- should be resolved now. |
Nice! I don't have time to fully review and merge until this afternoon ET, but I'll get back asap |
Thanks @jamiew looking forward to the discussion coming from this! |
Offhand I think this proposal is a great jumping off point. Obviously like to see some or all of the items in Unresolved Questions be addressed, but that would benefit from broader community discussion. Will number and merge for discussion |
Please direct any future discussion to #101 |
Draft for HIP pertaining to moving consensus group off miners and creating staking / validating pools mechanism around a new validator role.
Technically includes HIP-7 readme addition I apparently haven't requested a merge for.
Ed: rendered view -> https://github.com/cvolkernick/HIP/blob/master/xxxx-move-consensus-off-miners.md