-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Use TreeCursor to pretty-print :tree-sitter-subtree
The current `:tree-sitter-subtree` has a bug for field-names when the field name belongs to an unnamed child node. Take this ruby example: def self.method_name true end The subtree given by tree-sitter-cli is: (singleton_method [2, 0] - [4, 3] object: (self [2, 4] - [2, 8]) name: (identifier [2, 9] - [2, 20]) body: (body_statement [3, 2] - [3, 6] (true [3, 2] - [3, 6]))) But the `:tree-sitter-subtree` output was (singleton_method object: (self) body: (identifier) (body_statement (true))) The `singleton_method` rule defines the `name` and `body` fields in an unnamed helper rule `_method_rest` and the old implementation of `pretty_print_tree_impl` would pass the `field_name` down from the named `singleton_method` node. To fix it we switch to the [TreeCursor] API which is recommended by the tree-sitter docs for traversing the tree. `TreeCursor::field_name` accurately determines the field name for the current cursor position even when the node is unnamed. [TreeCursor]: https://docs.rs/tree-sitter/0.20.9/tree_sitter/struct.TreeCursor.html
- Loading branch information
1 parent
3814987
commit a48ec87
Showing
1 changed file
with
65 additions
and
30 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters