Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DAP: Add request ID to request timeout message #6018

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2023
Merged

DAP: Add request ID to request timeout message #6018

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2023

Conversation

xiaoma20082008
Copy link
Contributor

This improves error logging for dap requests - without the ID it's hard to
know which request is the one that timed out, just like 6010.

@pascalkuthe pascalkuthe added C-enhancement Category: Improvements E-easy Call for participation: Experience needed to fix: Easy / not much S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from a maintainer. labels Feb 16, 2023
pascalkuthe
pascalkuthe previously approved these changes Feb 16, 2023
Copy link
Member

@pascalkuthe pascalkuthe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Always good to have more detailed logging just like in #6010 👍 Especially with DAP integration hopefully seeing larger improvements and therefore more usage/testing in the future 👍

@xiaoma20082008
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for you replying. I had rebase the commit with more message

This improves error logging for dap requests. Without the ID
it's hard to know which request is the one that timed out.
@the-mikedavis the-mikedavis merged commit ce0837d into helix-editor:master Feb 16, 2023
wes-adams pushed a commit to wes-adams/helix that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2023
This improves error logging for dap requests. Without the ID
it's hard to know which request is the one that timed out.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-enhancement Category: Improvements E-easy Call for participation: Experience needed to fix: Easy / not much S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from a maintainer.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants