Update README.md - question regarding context

[jeremiah]

Small changes for clarity.

I feel more detail around "context" is needed. What do you mean when you say context here? Do you mean how is a given component used? E.g. is it source code, a combined work, or compiled binary?

[hesa]

Thanks.

The sections "Usecase", "Provisioning" and "Modification" are that context. But this is not presented clearly, agreed.

How about adding some words to the first section to, like this:

---

Answering whether one license is compatible with another needs some context. This context is often missing in the question but sometimes also in tooling. We have tried to organise this context and a way to provide this to the tool.

The context currently supported (more details below)

• Usecase
• Provisioning
• Modification

[jeremiah]

Determining if a license is compatible with another requires context which is often missing in tooling. We have tried to organise this context and to provide this to the tool. [Here I would describe the context itself. This is important because the use case won't really make sense to most people if the context is not understood.]

Usecase
Provisioning
Modification