-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Address line eCH-0010: Extension to define address lines #46
Comments
rename eCH-010 Address Line to eCH-010 Address Line Type |
decide if iso21090-ADXP-postBox should be used and postOfficeBox from http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7ch/ch-core/ValueSet-ech-10-line.html be removed |
concerning iso21090-ADXP-postBox, postOfficeBox the relevant text is the following: Die Postfachnummer darf nicht zusammen mit der Postfachbezeichnung in das Element postOfficeBoxText geschrieben werden, sondern muss separat im Element postOfficeBoxNumber übergeben werden. Im ValueSet http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7ch/ch-core/ValueSet-ech-10-line.html ist jetzt postOfficeBoxText für die line angegeben, die Extension iso21090-ADXP-postBox ist dann für die Postfachnummer. Bei der ch-core-address ist dieses Modell auch jetzt angegeben falls man die Adresse nach eCH angegeben will. |
Paul Bernet:
This heading suggests "address lines". However in the detail spec:
http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7ch/ch-core/ValueSet-ech-10-line.html
it looks as if there are “address line types” defined.
Looking at the address structure in more detail:
http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7ch/ch-core/StructureDefinition-ch-core-address-ech-10.html
in Tab “Differential Table” there is a: “iso21090-ADXP-postBox” as well as a “eCH-010 postOfficeBox”
Suggestion: Re-Discuss the need of having semantically structured address attributes vs going unstructured (eg. addressLine1-addressLine5)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: