-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(SIDM-3410-ips-preview): remove filter pattern in preview #272
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -77,4 +77,9 @@ variable asp_rg_override { | |
variable vault_name_override { | ||
description = "Vault Name" | ||
default = "" | ||
} | ||
|
||
variable "strategic_policies_privateIpsFilterPattern" { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The TF variable name doesn't need to match the application property name. Maybe we can simplify to:
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Conversely, I think retaining the same name make it much easier to identify mistakes and issues in the marshalling of variables through the provisioning tasks. |
||
description = "Private IPs Filter Pattern for Policies Evaluation" | ||
default = "10\\.\\d+\\.\\d+\\.\\d+" | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I thought the default was \Q10\E There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yeah you don't actually need to quote 10 in \Q \E |
||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we experiment with setting this to
What I'm thinking is:
This theory might prove wrong, but could we try it out please? :)