Move caseoutcome migration event to prod

[nitinprabhuhmcts]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

CCD diff report

AuthorisationCaseEvent/AuthorisationCaseEvent.json

CRUD	AccessProfile	CaseEventID
+CRU	+caseworker-sscs-superuser	+caseOutcomeMigration

CaseEvent/CaseEvent.json

RetriesTimeoutURLAboutToSubmitEvent	CallBackURLMidEvent	RetriesTimeoutURLSubmittedEvent	EventEnablingCondition	CallBackURLSubmittedEvent	ShowSummary	CallBackURLAboutToSubmitEvent	CallBackURLAboutToStartEvent	ShowEventNotes	PostConditionState	PreConditionState(s)	Description	Name	ID
+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+*	+*	+	+Case migrated automatically	+caseOutcomeMigration

CaseEvent/CaseEvent-nonprod.json

PostConditionState	PreConditionState(s)	Name	ID
-*	-*	-Case migrated automatically	-caseOutcomeMigration

[github-actions]

Integration Tests results

   82 files  ±0     82 suites  ±0   9m 51s ⏱️ +19s
1 424 tests ±0  1 416 ✅ ±0  8 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
1 425 runs  ±0  1 417 ✅ ±0  8 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 2beea49. ± Comparison against base commit 15f4f54.

This pull request removes 6 and adds 6 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=granted, date=2024-12-12]) [0]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=refused, date=2024-12-12]) [1]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyAndAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendBothConfidentialityLetters(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=granted, date=2024-12-12]) [0]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyAndAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendBothConfidentialityLetters(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=refused, date=2024-12-12]) [1]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=granted, date=2024-12-12]) [0]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=refused, date=2024-12-12]) [1]

uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=granted, date=2024-12-13]) [0]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=refused, date=2024-12-13]) [1]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyAndAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendBothConfidentialityLetters(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=granted, date=2024-12-13]) [0]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyAndAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendBothConfidentialityLetters(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=refused, date=2024-12-13]) [1]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=granted, date=2024-12-13]) [0]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=refused, date=2024-12-13]) [1]

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.