Trigger build with empty commit

[SomeshRA]

Jira link

https://tools.hmcts.net/jira/browse/SSCSSI-144

Change description

Analyse Welsh Case Urgent Hearing flow

• [x ] commit messages are meaningful and follow good commit message guidelines
• README and other documentation has been updated / added (if needed)
• tests have been updated / new tests has been added (if needed)
• Does this PR introduce a breaking change

[github-actions]

CCD diff report

No change

[github-actions]

Integration Tests results

   82 files  ±0     82 suites  ±0   9m 13s ⏱️ -3s
1 425 tests +1  1 417 ✅ +1  8 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
1 426 runs  +1  1 418 ✅ +1  8 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit ed8fbcf. ± Comparison against base commit 2626386.

This pull request removes 6 and adds 7 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=granted, date=2024-12-13]) [0]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=refused, date=2024-12-13]) [1]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyAndAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendBothConfidentialityLetters(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=granted, date=2024-12-13]) [0]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyAndAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendBothConfidentialityLetters(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=refused, date=2024-12-13]) [1]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=granted, date=2024-12-13]) [0]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=refused, date=2024-12-13]) [1]

uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=granted, date=2024-12-18]) [0]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=refused, date=2024-12-18]) [1]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyAndAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendBothConfidentialityLetters(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=granted, date=2024-12-18]) [0]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyAndAppellantConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendBothConfidentialityLetters(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=refused, date=2024-12-18]) [1]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=granted, date=2024-12-18]) [0]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationItForReviewConfidentialityRequestTest ‑ givenJointPartyConfidentialityRequest_shouldSendConfidentialityLetter(DatedRequestOutcome[requestOutcome=refused, date=2024-12-18]) [1]
uk.gov.hmcts.reform.sscs.tyanotifications.tya.NotificationsIt ‑ shouldSetInfectedBloodCompensationDescriptionInAcronymField

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.