Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make default output less noisy #81
Make default output less noisy #81
Changes from 5 commits
b5cc645
0e63272
9120c29
f25ec8b
d78a8eb
5f6cf75
b6f256b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this can just be
.*
instead of needing to make it optional; and at that point I think it would be simpler to inline it instead of usingformat
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aha! A regex Gotcha.
Fun fact: Inserting an
?
after a quantifier (*
,+
,?
or{N..M}
) switchesto non-greedy matching, which can be good for performance as it decreases
excessive backtracking from the usual greedy eater.
(It's the same symbol to make stuff optional... why...)
Well, that's a tiny text to match so I'll switch to
.+
anyways 👍.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do think this is a bit less readable from the editor, but the GitHub diff doesn't highlight the format placeholder.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This does work, but if the test fails, it doesn't give any tips on what changed, I'm not sure if it's a great approach.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For reference, here's the output we are matching:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's ok; if you run the test with
--nocapture
it will show the original output.