Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Move numba to top of dependencies #1366

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2024
Merged

ci: Move numba to top of dependencies #1366

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

hoxbro
Copy link
Member

@hoxbro hoxbro commented Oct 29, 2024

Will not solve on osx-64 because it is in a weird state between numba and python 3.13

image

@hoxbro hoxbro enabled auto-merge (squash) October 29, 2024 08:48
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.57%. Comparing base (09ea0f0) to head (1b046a0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1366   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.57%   88.57%           
=======================================
  Files          93       93           
  Lines       18644    18644           
=======================================
  Hits        16514    16514           
  Misses       2130     2130           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hoxbro hoxbro merged commit 9cf38ff into main Oct 29, 2024
12 checks passed
@hoxbro hoxbro deleted the ci_fix_slow_solve branch October 29, 2024 09:35
@@ -22,10 +22,10 @@ build = ["py311", "build"]
lint = ["py311", "lint"]

[dependencies]
numba = "*" # At top as this dictates Python version
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The order of the dependencies has some influence?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is because it would not solve on osx-64, see conda/rattler#913.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants