Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add audio feature sensors to Spotify #128785

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

joostlek
Copy link
Member

@joostlek joostlek commented Oct 19, 2024

Proposed change

Add audio feature sensors to Spotify

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@home-assistant
Copy link

Hey there @frenck, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (spotify) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of spotify can trigger bot actions by commenting:

  • @home-assistant close Closes the pull request.
  • @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the pull request.
  • @home-assistant reopen Reopen the pull request.
  • @home-assistant unassign spotify Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
  • @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) to the pull request.
  • @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) on the pull request.

homeassistant/components/spotify/sensor.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +28 to +29
with patch("homeassistant.components.spotify.PLATFORMS", [Platform.SENSOR]):
await setup_integration(hass, mock_config_entry)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should really figure out something for this weird patch behavior we put on everywhere. IMHO integration setup should just be a fixture and this patching should not be needed.

Copy link
Member Author

@joostlek joostlek Oct 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But I also don't find it ideal to have 5-10 extra mocks in the conftest, while 6-7 are only used in one test only.

It also makes it harder to see what the library should behave in one sight, you then are required to open two files to see the full picture.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But I also don't find it ideal to have 5-10 extra mocks in the conftest, while 6-7 are only used in one test only.

Not sure how that is related. We can just set up the whole integration. As a matter of fact. Setting up the integration partly as done in these constructs may hide side-effects.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think I understand what you mean

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is also not for now, I'm just not happy with seeing this pattern everywhere.

@home-assistant
Copy link

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot marked this pull request as draft October 19, 2024 17:26
@joostlek joostlek marked this pull request as ready for review October 19, 2024 20:22
@home-assistant home-assistant bot requested a review from frenck October 19, 2024 20:22
Copy link
Member

@frenck frenck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a conflict

Copy link
Member

@frenck frenck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using the right button this time 😓

@home-assistant home-assistant bot marked this pull request as draft October 20, 2024 08:06
@joostlek joostlek marked this pull request as ready for review October 20, 2024 09:26
@home-assistant home-assistant bot requested a review from frenck October 20, 2024 09:26
Copy link
Member

@frenck frenck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @joostlek 👍

../Frenck

@frenck frenck merged commit 827d6d1 into home-assistant:dev Oct 21, 2024
32 checks passed
@joostlek joostlek deleted the spotaf branch October 21, 2024 07:47
10100011 pushed a commit to 10100011/core that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 22, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants