Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add additional docs for importing code with asyncio #2338

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

bdraco
Copy link
Member

@bdraco bdraco commented Sep 26, 2024

Proposed change

Add additional docs for importing code with asyncio

When its safe to import keeps confusing devs so we need to provide more clarity here

Type of change

  • Document existing features within Home Assistant
  • Document new or changing features which there is an existing pull request elsewhere
  • Spelling or grammatical corrections, or rewording for improved clarity
  • Changes to the backend of this documentation
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • Link to relevant existing code or pull request:

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Note

Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait...

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cabd4e9 and 5563a4d.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • docs/asyncio_blocking_operations.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/asyncio_imports.md (1 hunks)
  • sidebars.js (1 hunks)
__________________________________________________________
< Keep your friends close, but your code reviewers closer. >
----------------------------------------------------------
 \
  \   \
       \ /\
       ( )
     .( o ).

Tip

CodeRabbit can approve the review once all CodeRabbit's comments are resolved.

Enable the reviews.request_changes_workflow setting in your project's settings in CodeRabbit to automatically approve the review once all CodeRabbit's comments are resolved.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@bdraco bdraco marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2024 13:59
Copy link
Contributor

@emontnemery emontnemery left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple of comments


## Top-level imports

Suppose your imports happen at the top-level (nearly all code at indentation level 0). Home Assistant will import your code before the event loop starts or import it in the import executor when your integration is loaded. In this case, you likely do not need to consider whether your imports are safe.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the correct term is "module level" since it mentions indentation level 0?
Should we explain there needs to a chain of imports starting from a package's __init__.py?


## Imports outside of top-level

If your imports are not happening at top-level, you must carefully consider each import, as the import machinery has to read the module from disk which does blocking I/O. If possible, it's usually best to change to a top-level import, as it avoids much complexity and the risk of mistakes. Importing modules is both CPU-intensive and involves blocking I/O, so it is crucial to ensure these operations are executed in the executor.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think there are two reasons for doing non module-level imports:

  • Breaking circular import chains
    • Here, we could maybe mention imports which are only there for the benefit of the type check can be hidden behind an if TYPE_CHECKING: guard
    • We should probably also explain that if the import is imported also via an import chain starting at module-level of __init__.py it's safe to do a local import
  • Avoiding importing a large set of modules which will mostly be unused
    • I think this is the case where it's relevant to manually do imports in the executor?

@frenck frenck marked this pull request as draft September 30, 2024 20:16
@frenck
Copy link
Member

frenck commented Sep 30, 2024

Drafted the PR as changes have been requested.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants