Add section about updating dependencies in the Perfect PR #2447
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces an update to the "Pull request review process" document, specifically adding a new guideline for contributors about handling dependency updates. This guideline advises that dependency updates should be made in a standalone pull request, separate from other changes, and includes instructions for providing relevant links in the PR description. The overall structure of the document remains unchanged, with the new guideline integrated into the existing content. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Contributor
participant ReviewProcess
participant PRSystem
Contributor->>PRSystem: Create PR with dependency update
PRSystem->>ReviewProcess: Check PR guidelines
ReviewProcess-->>Contributor: Confirm standalone PR required
Contributor->>PRSystem: Submit standalone PR with links
PRSystem->>ReviewProcess: Review PR
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/review-process.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
docs/review-process.md (6)
Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - For instructional content in documentation, use a direct and authoritative tone. Avoid expressions of politeness such as 'may' or 'please', and ensure the goal of the instruction is fronted.
- Apply the Microsoft Style Guide to ensure documentation maintains clarity and conciseness.
- In step-by-step instructions, front the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
- In step-by-step instructions, front the 'goal' in the instructional sentence.
- In step-by-step instructions, if in doubt what to front, front the 'goal' before the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
- do not hyphenate terms like 'top-right' or 'bottom-left' with 'corner'
Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Use bold to mark UI strings.
- If "" are used to mark UI strings, replace them by bold.
Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Be brief in your replies and don't add fluff like "thank you for..." and "Please let me know if"
Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Use sentence-style capitalization also in headings.
Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): do not comment on HTML used for icons
Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): Avoid flagging inline HTML for embedding videos in future reviews for this repository.
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/review-process.md
[style] ~95-~95: The word “also” tends to be overused. Consider using a formal alternative to strengthen your wording.
Context: ..., these can be added in a follow-up. Please also ensure that the PR description contains...
(PLEASE_ALSO_CHECK)
[grammar] ~103-~103: There may an error in the verb form ‘be restrict’.
Context: ...ewing the new features, as it should be restrict the tests to a single integration. ## ...
(MD_BE_NON_VBP)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/review-process.md (1)
91-103: LGTM! Valuable addition to the documentation
The new section provides clear and practical guidelines for handling dependency updates in PRs. The content is well-structured and aligns with the document's overall purpose.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~95-~95: The word “also” tends to be overused. Consider using a formal alternative to strengthen your wording.
Context: ..., these can be added in a follow-up. Please also ensure that the PR description contains...
(PLEASE_ALSO_CHECK)
[grammar] ~103-~103: There may an error in the verb form ‘be restrict’.
Context: ...ewing the new features, as it should be restrict the tests to a single integration. ## ...
(MD_BE_NON_VBP)
|
Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍 |
Co-authored-by: Joost Lekkerkerker <joostlek@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Proposed change
Type of change
Additional information
Summary by CodeRabbit