Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

travis: use default xenial instead of trusty #485

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2021

Conversation

daltonbohning
Copy link
Collaborator

@daltonbohning daltonbohning commented May 3, 2021

The "trusty' distro seems to be missing a public key.

The Travis documentation recommends not using Trusty, as it is EOL:

For reference, this is the difference:

Signed-off-by: Dalton Bohning daltonx.bohning@intel.com

@daltonbohning daltonbohning self-assigned this May 3, 2021
@daltonbohning daltonbohning changed the title travis: workaround for missing public key travis: workaround for missing public keys May 3, 2021
@daltonbohning daltonbohning changed the title travis: workaround for missing public keys travis: use default xenial instead of trust May 3, 2021
Trusty is EOL and no longer supported.
Use the default Xenial 16.04

Signed-off-by: Dalton Bohning <daltonx.bohning@intel.com>
@daltonbohning daltonbohning changed the title travis: use default xenial instead of trust travis: use default xenial instead of trusty May 3, 2021
@daltonbohning daltonbohning requested a review from adammoody May 3, 2021 18:52
@daltonbohning
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@adammoody Very simple change. This fixes the build errors that have been occurring, since trusty is EOL.

Copy link
Member

@adammoody adammoody left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, thanks @daltonbohning

@daltonbohning daltonbohning merged commit 42a8b88 into hpc:master May 4, 2021
@daltonbohning daltonbohning deleted the dbohninx-travis branch May 4, 2021 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants