Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HPCC-32958 Roxie dynamic priority #19300

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: candidate-9.8.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mckellyln
Copy link
Contributor

Type of change:

  • This change is a bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • This change is a new feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • This change improves the code (refactor or other change that does not change the functionality)
  • This change fixes warnings (the fix does not alter the functionality or the generated code)
  • This change is a breaking change (fix or feature that will cause existing behavior to change).
  • This change alters the query API (existing queries will have to be recompiled)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
    • My code does not create any new warnings from compiler, build system, or lint.
  • The commit message is properly formatted and free of typos.
    • The commit message title makes sense in a changelog, by itself.
    • The commit is signed.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
    • I have updated the documentation accordingly, or...
    • I have created a JIRA ticket to update the documentation.
    • Any new interfaces or exported functions are appropriately commented.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTORS document.
  • The change has been fully tested:
    • I have added tests to cover my changes.
    • All new and existing tests passed.
    • I have checked that this change does not introduce memory leaks.
    • I have used Valgrind or similar tools to check for potential issues.
  • I have given due consideration to all of the following potential concerns:
    • Scalability
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Thread-safety
    • Cloud-compatibility
    • Premature optimization
    • Existing deployed queries will not be broken
    • This change fixes the problem, not just the symptom
    • The target branch of this pull request is appropriate for such a change.
  • There are no similar instances of the same problem that should be addressed
    • I have addressed them here
    • I have raised JIRA issues to address them separately
  • This is a user interface / front-end modification
    • I have tested my changes in multiple modern browsers
    • The component(s) render as expected

Smoketest:

  • Send notifications about my Pull Request position in Smoketest queue.
  • Test my draft Pull Request.

Testing:

@mckellyln
Copy link
Contributor Author

NOTE: this PR is an extension of existing PR:
#19300
which is from JIRA:
https://hpccsystems.atlassian.net/browse/HPCC-32964

@mckellyln mckellyln force-pushed the dynamic_priority branch 5 times, most recently from 5238e32 to 0e96a35 Compare November 14, 2024 19:36
Copy link

Jira Issue: https://hpccsystems.atlassian.net//browse/HPCC-32958

Jirabot Action Result:
Assigning user: mark.kelly@lexisnexisrisk.com
Workflow Transition To: Merge Pending
Updated PR

@mckellyln mckellyln force-pushed the dynamic_priority branch 5 times, most recently from 1d71248 to 3e1e54b Compare November 21, 2024 18:36
@mckellyln mckellyln force-pushed the dynamic_priority branch 3 times, most recently from 5647b98 to aa08cb1 Compare November 22, 2024 14:50
Signed-off-by: M Kelly <mark.kelly+copilot@lexisnexisrisk.com>
Signed-off-by: M Kelly <mark.kelly+copilot@lexisnexisrisk.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant