Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

:// to use command name for scheme #1195

Closed
1 task done
sevenc-nanashi opened this issue Oct 29, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1197
Closed
1 task done

:// to use command name for scheme #1195

sevenc-nanashi opened this issue Oct 29, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1197
Labels
enhancement New feature or enhancement
Milestone

Comments

@sevenc-nanashi
Copy link

sevenc-nanashi commented Oct 29, 2021

Checklist

  • I've searched for similar feature requests.

Enhancement request

:// for use command name for scheme, like this:

http ://example.com 
--> http://example.com
https ://example.com
 --> https://example.com

Problem it solves

This will make requesting from clipboard more easy, it's just putting space.


Additional information, screenshots, or code examples

@sevenc-nanashi sevenc-nanashi added enhancement New feature or enhancement new Needs triage. Comments are welcome! labels Oct 29, 2021
jkbrzt added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2021
jkbrzt added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2021
…RL to calls (#1197)

* Strip leading `://` from URLs to allow quick conversion of a pasted URL to calls

Closes #1195

* Markdown lint

* Cleanup

* Cleanup

* Drop extraneous space

* Fix example
@jkbrzt
Copy link
Member

jkbrzt commented Nov 5, 2021

@sevenc-nanashi thanks for the suggestion — implemented in master 🎉

@jkbrzt jkbrzt removed the new Needs triage. Comments are welcome! label Nov 5, 2021
@isidentical isidentical added this to the HTTPie 3.0 milestone Nov 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants