-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Community Pipeline] Mix Prompting pipeline? #1029
Comments
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. If you think this still needs to be addressed please comment on this thread. Please note that issues that do not follow the contributing guidelines are likely to be ignored. |
There is a ICLR 2022 paper "PROMPT-TO-PROMPT IMAGE EDITING WITH CROSS-ATTENTION CONTROL" that does similar but more things into the pipeline. There are also open sourced code in the web, would be interesting to add them to Diffusers too @patrickvonplaten https://github.com/google/prompt-to-prompt |
Hey @Randolph-zeng, we are working on enabling exactly this use case: #1639 |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. If you think this still needs to be addressed please comment on this thread. Please note that issues that do not follow the contributing guidelines are likely to be ignored. |
Idea
I've been playing with this concept of mixed embeddings. The premise is simple: the pipeline takes a list of prompts and generates images based on a mix of embeddings of the prompts. It produces some interesting mixed-up outcomes.
Example
Prompt 1:
a mountain, cinematic angle, studio Ghibli, cinematic lighting, detailed oil painting, hyperrealistic, 8k
Prompt 2:
A long and winding beach, tropical, bright, simple, by Studio Ghibli and Greg Rutkowski, artstation
Prompt 1 only
Prompt 2 only
Prompt 1 + Prompt 2
Implementation
I've put up a working implementation for this here. I could open up a PR for a community pipeline for this if that's something folks would like to be added. #841
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: