-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 570
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix list_models bool parameters #1152
Conversation
The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged. |
@_deprecate_arguments( | ||
version="0.14", | ||
deprecated_args={"cardData"}, | ||
custom_message="Use 'full' instead.", | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cardData
and full
had exactly the same behavior so I squeezed cardData
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed, I tried it as well and it returns the same values. I'm not sure if this is intended though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the codebase it was literally:
if full is not None:
if full:
params.update({"full": True})
if cardData is not None:
if cardData:
params.update({"full": True})
And I tested in on the API, "cardData" doesn't seem to be a valid parameter for the /datasets
endpoint. That's why I just removed the cardData
param. I tend to think that it comes from a copy-paste of the arguments from list_models
and not adapted correctly.
https://huggingface.co/api/datasets?limit=1 => base
https://huggingface.co/api/datasets?limit=1&cardData=1 => base
https://huggingface.co/api/datasets?limit=1&full=1 => full
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah lol indeed!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apart from that, are you ok with the changes in the PR @LysandreJik ? 🙂
Codecov ReportBase: 84.59% // Head: 84.57% // Decreases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1152 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.59% 84.57% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 42 42
Lines 4187 4182 -5
==========================================
- Hits 3542 3537 -5
Misses 645 645
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
@_deprecate_arguments( | ||
version="0.14", | ||
deprecated_args={"cardData"}, | ||
custom_message="Use 'full' instead.", | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah lol indeed!
Thanks for the review and approval @LysandreJik, I'm merging :) |
Fix #1146.
With this PR, params
fetch_config
andcardData
are not sent when value isFalse
inlist_models
list_datasets
. Also switched their type fromOptional[bool] = None
tobool = False
for simplicity.