Fixes default value of softmax_scale in PhiFlashAttention2.
#28537
Conversation
| >>> model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("susnato/phi-2") | ||
| >>> tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("susnato/phi-2") | ||
| >>> model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("phi-2") | ||
| >>> tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("phi-2") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for changing these checkpoints. 🙌
I was about to open a PR to change these
| attn_output = self._flash_attention_forward( | ||
| query_states, key_states, value_states, attention_mask, q_len, dropout=attn_dropout, softmax_scale=1.0 | ||
| query_states, key_states, value_states, attention_mask, q_len, dropout=attn_dropout, softmax_scale=None | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah, was this the reason for the issue regarding fine-tuning?
Now I am curious how the FA tests were passing before...
Anyway thanks a lot for fixing this!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I hope it is fixed, at least, I am now able to see the same fine-tuning loss with/without flash-attention.
We pre-trained the Phi models using 1 / sqrt(head_dim) as the softmax scale, and flash-attention uses the very same value when softmax_scale=None
There was a problem hiding this comment.
BTW just to be sure, could you please run all flash attention tests(for phi) to check if they are passing or not.
RUN_SLOW=1 pytest -m flash_attn_test tests/models/phi --verbose
Should not be necessary since it's already fixing the fine-tuning issue, but just to be sure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just ran and everything has passed!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yep, our CIs don't test flash attention, bit of a pity!
|
The |
| attn_output = self._flash_attention_forward( | ||
| query_states, key_states, value_states, attention_mask, q_len, dropout=attn_dropout, softmax_scale=1.0 | ||
| query_states, key_states, value_states, attention_mask, q_len, dropout=attn_dropout, softmax_scale=None | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yep, our CIs don't test flash attention, bit of a pity!
|
No problems! Thanks for the merge! |
|
Thanks very much @gugarosa for the deep dive and the fix! |
|
The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. |
…ingface#28537) * fix(phi): Phi does not use softmax_scale in Flash-Attention. * chore(docs): Update Phi docs.
…ingface#28537) * fix(phi): Phi does not use softmax_scale in Flash-Attention. * chore(docs): Update Phi docs.
What does this PR do?
Phi has never used
softmax_scale=1.0with Flash-Attention, so the default is being moved toNone. This tentatively fixes any issue regarding fine-tuning Phi-based checkpoints when Flash-Attention 2 is turned on.Documentation is also updated to reflect the official Phi checkpoints.
Fixes #28488 (tentative)
Before submitting
Pull Request section?
to it if that's the case.
documentation guidelines, and
here are tips on formatting docstrings.
Who can review?
@ArthurZucker @susnato