-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Show all users in post author column. #106
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d680e22
Show all users in post author column.
e681ffd
Check users from the entire network in all cases
roborourke fd65bf3
Fix code style for comments
roborourke 7fee064
Fix code style for comments
roborourke 49bccb2
Add multisite specific tests
roborourke c271235
Fix code style issue, double quote -> single
roborourke File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This changes the existing logic but it’s not clear why. For any post type that doesn’t support authorship the function will now always return an empty array
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll test some more and see if I can tweak this further
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure why this change was needed at all to be honest, what lead you to altering it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The function
get_author_ids
currently checks if a post type is not supported and then followed by doing awp_get_post_terms
which if the user is a super admin it returns an empty array.So my thinking was to perform the check first for
wp_get_post_terms
if it returns an error or was empty then it would return the post author details. Looking at it now it could probably do with dropping theis_post_type_supported
check too.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it can just be put back how it was - the problem was fixed just adding the
blog_id => 0
argument right?The change you have here will now cause a DB query even if the post type does not support multiple authors. Sometimes condensing logic like this doesn't help with performance or readability.
It's always good to do one thing at a time, ideally starting with conditionals that are the least effort to process, e.g. not checking the db.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
blog_id => 0
allows us to get the user who isn't assigned to the existing site when we have an ID. However with the current code in place forget_author_ids
it returns an empty array still which will still show the reported issue.So this change will ensure an author ID is returned.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could the problem be that when saving the author terms they aren't being stored if the user doesn't have a role on the current site?
This is still hiding the real issue I think -
wp_get_post_terms( $post->ID, TAXONOMY );
should be returning IDs even for users that don't strictly have a role on the site.