fix: not running all requests in the Postman collection

[kevin-hyperjump]

Monika Pull Request (PR)

1. Fixes Not running all requests in the Postman collection #730
2. Adds support for Postman collection v2.0

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #731 (f16b115) into main (3c70de7) will decrease coverage by 0.21%.
The diff coverage is 54.54%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #731      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   48.37%   48.15%   -0.22%     
==========================================
  Files          68       68              
  Lines        2245     2255      +10     
  Branches      426      435       +9     
==========================================
  Hits         1086     1086              
+ Misses       1011     1010       -1     
- Partials      148      159      +11     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/components/config/parse-postman.ts	55.55% <54.54%> (-21.37%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3c70de7...f16b115. Read the comment docs.

[kevin-hyperjump]

Example of Postman collection v2.0

{
  "info": {
    "_postman_id": "0653fc29-a517-4f78-820a-66b207c7cd62",
    "name": "Monika Monitor Collection",
    "schema": "https://schema.getpostman.com/json/collection/v2.0.0/collection.json"
  },
  "item": [
    {
      "name": "[GitHub API] Hyperjump",
      "protocolProfileBehavior": {
        "disableBodyPruning": true
      },
      "request": {
        "method": "GET",
        "header": [],
        "body": {
          "mode": "raw",
          "raw": "{\n    \"any\": \"any\"\n}\n",
          "options": {
            "raw": {
              "language": "json"
            }
          }
        },
        "url": "https://api.github.com/users/hyperjumptech"
      },
      "response": []
    },
    {
      "name": "[GitHub API] Hyperjump Repos",
      "request": {
        "method": "GET",
        "header": [],
        "url": "https://api.github.com/users/hyperjumptech/repos"
      },
      "response": []
    }
  ]
}

Example of Postman collection v2.1

{
  "info": {
    "_postman_id": "0653fc29-a517-4f78-820a-66b207c7cd62",
    "name": "Monika Monitor Collection",
    "schema": "https://schema.getpostman.com/json/collection/v2.1.0/collection.json"
  },
  "item": [
    {
      "name": "[GitHub API] Hyperjump",
      "request": {
        "method": "GET",
        "header": [],
        "url": {
          "raw": "https://api.github.com/users/hyperjumptech",
          "protocol": "https",
          "host": [
            "api",
            "github",
            "com"
          ],
          "path": [
            "users",
            "hyperjumptech"
          ]
        }
      },
      "response": []
    },
    {
      "name": "[GitHub API] Hyperjump Repos",
      "request": {
        "method": "GET",
        "header": [],
        "url": {
          "raw": "https://api.github.com/users/hyperjumptech/repos",
          "protocol": "https",
          "host": [
            "api",
            "github",
            "com"
          ],
          "path": [
            "users",
            "hyperjumptech",
            "repos"
          ]
        }
      },
      "response": []
    }
  ]
}

[nicnocquee]

Can you also add the test to make sure the parsed postman config contain the expected number of probes? I think right now the test only checks the first probe.

[kevin-hyperjump]

Can you also add the test to make sure the parsed postman config contain the expected number of probes? I think right now the test only checks the first probe.

I've rewritten the entire Postman tests, both integration and unit test 😈

[sapiderman]

👻 👽 👾