Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revisit presentation preview #187

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

Revisit presentation preview #187

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

sklump
Copy link
Contributor

@sklump sklump commented Aug 15, 2019

to allow for unrevealed attrs and self-attested attrs; remove non-revocation timestamps from presentation preview.

sklump added 6 commits August 13, 2019 09:52
…ealed attributes

Signed-off-by: sklump <srklump@hotmail.com>
…cation timestamps to attribute spec

Signed-off-by: sklump <srklump@hotmail.com>
…n cred def supporting revocation

Signed-off-by: sklump <srklump@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: sklump <srklump@hotmail.com>
…or unrevealed and self-attested attrs

Signed-off-by: sklump <srklump@hotmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@kdenhartog kdenhartog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Do you believe this is ready to be merged or do you have some more changes you'd like to make first?

@sklump
Copy link
Contributor Author

sklump commented Aug 16, 2019 via email

@kdenhartog
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds good 👍

@dhh1128
Copy link
Contributor

dhh1128 commented Aug 16, 2019

I think these are good changes and should be merged. Just noting that whichever PR is merged first (this one or #189 ), the other will have some merge conflicts that need to be resolved.

@dhh1128 dhh1128 self-assigned this Aug 16, 2019
@sklump
Copy link
Contributor Author

sklump commented Aug 16, 2019

Hello, I've got all my unit tests to pass on my prototype. I believe you should merge this as is and then we can revisit what to take out and/or add from this position of strength.

@sklump
Copy link
Contributor Author

sklump commented Aug 19, 2019

I will rework #36 and #37 with Daniel's implicit attribute specification encoding in their respective preview inner message objects, then submit another PR.

@sklump sklump closed this Aug 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants