Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FAB-17950] Implement removal of orderer endpoints from toplevel channel #29

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2020

Conversation

stephyee
Copy link
Contributor

Type of change

  • New feature

Description

Implement removal of orderer addresses from the top level of a new ConfigTx's channel group to remove the legacy config value.

Related issues

FAB-17950

@stephyee stephyee force-pushed the fab-17950 branch 3 times, most recently from 292280e to f15bf3a Compare June 11, 2020 12:38
@stephyee stephyee marked this pull request as ready for review June 11, 2020 12:52
@stephyee stephyee requested a review from a team as a code owner June 11, 2020 12:52
Copy link
Contributor

@wlahti wlahti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good overall to me. Just one comment about a comment. :)

configtx/channel.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
config

Signed-off-by: Tiffany Harris <tiffany.harris@ibm.com>

// RemoveLegacyOrdererAddresses removes the deprecated top level orderer addresses config key and value
// from the channel config.
// In fabric 1.4, top level orderer addresses were migrated to the org level orderer endpoints
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: period at end of sentence :p

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

.

@caod123 caod123 merged commit 822f633 into hyperledger:master Jun 11, 2020
@stephyee stephyee deleted the fab-17950 branch June 11, 2020 15:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants