Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FAB-8443] Update sampleconfig chaincodeAddress comments #1386

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2020

Conversation

stephyee
Copy link
Contributor

@stephyee stephyee commented Jun 10, 2020

Type of change

  • Documentation update

Description

Update chaincodeAddress comments in sample config core.yaml to reflect the implementation

Related issues

FAB-8443

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ peer:
# The endpoint the chaincode for this peer uses to connect to the peer.
# If this is not specified, the chaincodeListenAddress address is selected.
# And if chaincodeListenAddress is not specified, address is selected from
# peer listenAddress.
# peer address (see below).
# chaincodeAddress: 0.0.0.0:7052

# When used as peer config, this represents the endpoint to other peers
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible to extend this explanation a bit? In particular, how it relates to addressAutoDetect?

Signed-off-by: Tiffany Harris <tiffany.harris@ibm.com>
@stephyee stephyee marked this pull request as ready for review June 12, 2020 14:52
@stephyee stephyee requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2020 14:52
@caod123 caod123 merged commit 0d5e664 into hyperledger:master Jun 15, 2020
sijocherian pushed a commit to sijocherian/fabric that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2020
…#1386)

Signed-off-by: Tiffany Harris <tiffany.harris@ibm.com>
@stephyee stephyee deleted the fab-8443 branch July 29, 2020 21:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants