NEW target blueberryF405&blueberryF435 #10460
Conversation
|
Add New target BLUEBERRYF405 and BLUEBERRYF435 |
|
@sunyanmeng963 are you familiar with https://github.com/iNavFlight/inav/blob/master/docs/policies/NEW_HARDWARE_POLICY.md ? Are you already in contact with the team to provide samples, or is this an unofficial target? |
|
We are a newly formed hardware team,This is our hardware |
|
@sunyanmeng963 no need to resubmit the PR. This one is fine. Just check out the document and take it from there. The flight controller looks interesting. It looks reasonably small. I'm guessing around 26mm x 40mm? Can it provide 6V for the servos? |
|
Yes, the size is similar, it has two versions, the target is the same, one version is ***@***.***, the other is ***@***.***, the picture is 5V3A
3330224355
***@***.***
…------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "iNavFlight/inav" ***@***.***>;
发送时间: 2024年11月14日(星期四) 晚上7:34
***@***.***>;
***@***.******@***.***>;
主题: Re: [iNavFlight/inav] fix sdd NEW target blueberryF405&blueberryF435 (PR #10460)
@sunyanmeng963 no need to resubmit the PR. This one is fine. Just check out the document and take it from there.
The flight controller looks interesting. It looks reasonably small. I'm guessing around 26mm x 40mm? Can it provide 6V for the servos?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
@sunyanmeng963 one thing you may want to look at if you revise the board is the layout of the cam connector. Traditionally, 3 pin dupont connections like that always have power in the middle. With your cam connector, you have power on the outside. Matek had this on their original F405-WING flight controller. People were constantly complaining as they had blown something up. Due to the irregular ordering on the connector. Gnd - 5V - Cam would be better. Also, you have 24V labelled all over the place. I'm assuming that this is to signify voltage from the battery? If so, using Vcc or Vbat would be better on the silkscreen. Stating a voltage, people will think that is the voltage being output. |
|
Splitting the 2 targets in separate PRs can simplify the merging / validation process. Otherwise a delay in the f435 will hold up the f405 version. |
|
Yes,24V is the battery voltage, it represents 6S battery, we directly mark 24V is to prevent some people mistakenly think that 9V directly take it to 2S equipment
Its filter circuit is composed of inductors and capacitors to supply power for analog graph transmission, the effect is not bad, but it is a bad design, we are ready to change it into BEC
3330224355
***@***.***
…------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "iNavFlight/inav" ***@***.***>;
发送时间: 2024年11月14日(星期四) 晚上7:50
***@***.***>;
***@***.******@***.***>;
主题: Re: [iNavFlight/inav] fix sdd NEW target blueberryF405&blueberryF435 (PR #10460)
@sunyanmeng963 one thing you may want to look at if you revise the board is the layout of the cam connector. Traditionally, 3 pin dupont connections like that always have power in the middle. With your cam connector, you have power on the outside. Matek had this on their original F405-WING flight controller. People were constantly complaining as they had blown something up. Due to the irregular ordering on the connector. Gnd - 5V - Cam would be better.
Also, you have 24V labelled all over the place. I'm assuming that this is to signify voltage from the battery? If so, using Vcc or Vbat would be better on the silkscreen. Stating a voltage, people will think that is the voltage being output.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
Ok, I will submit PR again after the modification
3330224355
***@***.***
…------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "iNavFlight/inav" ***@***.***>;
发送时间: 2024年11月14日(星期四) 晚上8:19
***@***.***>;
***@***.******@***.***>;
主题: Re: [iNavFlight/inav] fix sdd NEW target blueberryF405&blueberryF435 (PR #10460)
Splitting the 2 targets in separate PRs can simplify the merging / validation process. Otherwise a delay in the f435 will hold up the f405 version.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
mmosca
changed the title
IMHO, marking it as 24V would be confusing. People are used to pads marked with a voltage, outputting that specific voltage. If it is just battery voltage. The common labelling that people are used to on flight controllers is VCC or VBAT. |
No description provided.