You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If the SunPKCS11 provider is specified on the getInstance call a no such provider exception will be thrown. If no provider is specified on the getInstance call the first provider in the java security provider list will be used, if the customer is relying on the provider order and have placed SunPKCS11 above others with the intent of using that provider, it will not be used, another provider will be used without notifying the customer. Thus if the customer is relying on the use of Crypto cards for auditing or to meet requirements they will have a silent failure in their process. When debugging why the SunPKCS11 provider is not being used, one might specify -Djava.security.debug=sunpkcs11, there will be no output. Thus there is no indication of what the cause of the problem is.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
tajila
pushed a commit
to tajila/openj9-openjdk-jdk
that referenced
this issue
Mar 27, 2024
If the SunPKCS11 provider is specified on the getInstance call a no such provider exception will be thrown. If no provider is specified on the getInstance call the first provider in the java security provider list will be used, if the customer is relying on the provider order and have placed SunPKCS11 above others with the intent of using that provider, it will not be used, another provider will be used without notifying the customer. Thus if the customer is relying on the use of Crypto cards for auditing or to meet requirements they will have a silent failure in their process. When debugging why the SunPKCS11 provider is not being used, one might specify -Djava.security.debug=sunpkcs11, there will be no output. Thus there is no indication of what the cause of the problem is.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: