Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge latest openj9 changes to 0.43 #722

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 7, 2023
Merged

Merge latest openj9 changes to 0.43 #722

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 7, 2023

Conversation

pshipton
Copy link
Member

@pshipton pshipton commented Dec 7, 2023

No description provided.

ThanHenderson and others added 6 commits December 4, 2023 12:53
This patch addresses eclipse-openj9/openj9#14985.
For MethodHandles to private interface methods, the RI erroneously
initializes the MethodHandle to have an InvokeInterface reference
kind, leading to an invoke-time AbstractMethodError throw.

As per the spec, OpenJ9 initializes MethodHandles to private interface
methods to have an InvokeSpecial reference kind which does not throw
the error.

This distinction causes a test failure for a test reported in
eclipse-openj9/openj9#14985. Though not-spec compliant, the test expects
an AbstractMethodError to be thrown to conform to the RI behaviour. For
OpenJ9 MHs, MethodHandles.unreflect identifies private interface methods
and installs an AbstractMethodError-thrower MH. This patch sets up a
similar mechanism for OpenJDK MHs by calling a MethodHandleResolver
method that installs the AbstractMethodError-thrower MH.

Issues: eclipse-openj9/openj9#14985
Signed-off-by: Nathan Henderson <nathan.henderson@ibm.com>
Match RI behaviour for MethodHandles.unrelfect with OpenJDK MHs
Signed-off-by: Keith W. Campbell <keithc@ca.ibm.com>
- Add FIPS exclude files for multiple profiles

Signed-off-by: LongyuZhang <longyu.zhang@ibm.com>
Add FIPS exclude files for multiple profiles to JDK8
Include new "access" shared library in test-image
@JasonFengJ9 JasonFengJ9 merged commit 14ae923 into v0.43.0-release Dec 7, 2023
9 of 27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants