Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setup SQA documents for python #19015

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 19, 2023
Merged

Conversation

aeslaughter
Copy link
Contributor

(refs #18910)

F-07 from 2020 MOOSE/BISON Assessment

@moosebuild
Copy link
Contributor

moosebuild commented Oct 6, 2021

Job Documentation on 2a0ec24 wanted to post the following:

View the site here

This comment will be updated on new commits.

@aeslaughter aeslaughter marked this pull request as ready for review October 6, 2021 22:36
@aeslaughter
Copy link
Contributor Author

aeslaughter commented Oct 6, 2021

@permcody @cticenhour @loganharbour This sets up the documents for moose/python. If you run "./moosedocs.py check" in python/doc it will give you a list of things that need to be fixed. Also, you might want to go through some of the templates to make sure the default framework content makes sense. That should probably be done for all the modules and applications.

This same kind of things can be done for CIVET, the exception is that the sqa directory you should load the basic template (e.g., https://github.com/idaholab/moose/blob/next/framework/doc/content/templates/sqa/far.md.template). Those are the recreations of the INL templates.

Then you just need to add documentation for CIVET and figure out how you want to capture requirement/design/issue content. I would recommend creating a new MooseDocs extension, like the appsyntax, that reads the information from somewhere in CIVET. The extension can live in CIVET itself. You should then be able to create all the same linkage that we have MOOSE. I don't think it will be a huge lift and will get someone comfortable working in the system.

✋ 🎤

@aeslaughter aeslaughter changed the title Setup SQA documents for pythion Setup SQA documents for python Oct 6, 2021
@aeslaughter
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like the config.yml for Mastodon`` and RELAP-7 need a few changes. Here are the changes for MASTODON (I think), something similar is probably needed for RELAP-7.

idaholab/mastodon#396

@loganharbour loganharbour self-assigned this Oct 9, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PRs that have reached or exceeded 90 days with no activity label Mar 11, 2022
@loganharbour loganharbour removed the stale PRs that have reached or exceeded 90 days with no activity label Mar 11, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity in the last 100 days. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PRs that have reached or exceeded 90 days with no activity label Jun 20, 2022
@cticenhour cticenhour removed the stale PRs that have reached or exceeded 90 days with no activity label Jun 20, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity in the last 100 days. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PRs that have reached or exceeded 90 days with no activity label Sep 29, 2022
@cticenhour cticenhour removed the stale PRs that have reached or exceeded 90 days with no activity label Sep 29, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2023

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity in the last 100 days. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PRs that have reached or exceeded 90 days with no activity label Jan 8, 2023
@cticenhour cticenhour removed the stale PRs that have reached or exceeded 90 days with no activity label Jan 8, 2023
@moosebuild
Copy link
Contributor

moosebuild commented Jan 12, 2023

Job Coverage on 2a0ec24 wanted to post the following:

Framework coverage

f9a2a7 #19015 2a0ec2
Total Total +/- New
Rate 84.61% 84.61% -0.00% -
Hits 81934 81933 -1 0
Misses 14900 14901 +1 0

Diff coverage report

Full coverage report

Modules coverage

Coverage did not change

Full coverage reports

Reports

This comment will be updated on new commits.

@idaholab idaholab deleted a comment from moosebuild Jan 12, 2023
cticenhour pushed a commit to idaholab/mastodon that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2023
@cticenhour
Copy link
Member

cticenhour commented Jan 16, 2023

  • Griffin patch is here
  • Mastodon patch is here
  • RELAP-7 patch is here, though I now see the repository as a private archive (along with a few others, like marmot)?

@loganharbour how do we want to approach getting all of this in?

Also tagging @zachmprince, @cbolisetti, @bwspenc, and @joshuahansel for awareness.

@loganharbour
Copy link
Member

I'm dragged down with the GHE transition. Won't be in a good place to facilitate until this afternoon at the earliest

cticenhour pushed a commit to cticenhour/mastodon that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2023
cticenhour pushed a commit to idaholab/mastodon that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2023
@aeslaughter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cticenhour I feel sorry for you, but not enough to help you, please don't hurt me.

@cticenhour
Copy link
Member

@aeslaughter Ha! No promises. 😄 Hope you're doing well!

@cticenhour
Copy link
Member

cticenhour commented Jan 19, 2023

Failed apps have patches ready.

@cticenhour cticenhour merged commit 8eccbd3 into idaholab:next Jan 19, 2023
@aeslaughter aeslaughter deleted the sqa-training-18910 branch January 20, 2023 03:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants