-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
release v1.15.0 #556
release v1.15.0 #556
Conversation
Took a while to hunt down why my config wasn't working and figured out that I needed to add this dependency only after reading through [#238](#238) and noticing [this line in a linked example](https://gist.github.com/ravasthi/abcfee465411fc45a8bc28decb9d8e5e#file-package-json-L24). I think adding this line may add some clarity and save time for several other webpack / eslint noobs (like me).
# Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md
[`no-absolute-path`]: ./docs/rules/no-absolute-path.md | ||
======= | ||
[`max-dependencies`]: ./docs/rules/max-dependencies.md | ||
>>>>>>> tizmagik/feature/max-dependencies |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahah! My publish reviews are finally useful: There's are traces of merge conflicts here 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
😅 I need a pre-commit hook for this. if even just for the changelog.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, there should be pre-commit hooks that warn when there are strings like <<<<<<<
anywhere in your project. Maybe an idea for https://github.com/SamVerschueren/clinton @SamVerschueren?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very good suggestion @jfmengels! Will add it.
LGTM :) I'm fine with releasing as is, but we're so close to merging #485 that it would be a shame not to include it right away. We could merge it and fix that last comment ourselves. What do you think? |
I'm cool with that, wasn't sure how fast it'd move today and I wanted to get the rest out the door. If you can merge it into master and rebase this branch back onto the new master, I'm up for it? or I can knock it out in the morning tomorrow probably |
Plus #555 needs review + will probably merge soon, so v1.16 is probably days away anyway. so I'm cool either way |
sweet deal, no worries. I'll probably punt on #485 until v1.16, and then release that with #555. will need to wait until tomorrow either way. some part of me still wants releases to be substantial, even though I'm on the CI/CD train. old habits, I guess. 😄 blog post sounds way more important/exciting, get after it! 😎 |
Should've really just done this last week 😳