-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed read_seq
for reading v1.3.1 sequence files
#162
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it is needed. In the old format, delay events were explicitly defined in the event table. In the new format, only the block duration is stored in the event table. However, to calculate the duration, we need the maximum of the stored delay and the actual duration of the block events (determined with
calc_duration
).get_block
gives us the stored block duration (where you previously got an error), i.e. the delay, which is used bycalc_duration
(but the output ofcalc_duration
might be larger depending on the events).I do feel the whole handling of the delay event is a bit messy in the new format. We define a delay event with
make_delay
, and can use it incalc_duration
. But as soon as we add it to the sequence, the delay event disappears. Instead,get_block
will just give us ablock_duration
field, which is a special case incalc_duration
(isinstance(event, (float, int))
). As a consequence, the only reasoncalc_duration
can determine the duration in this case, is because the duration was already stored.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, thanks for the nice explanation. Wasn't aware that the delay event is gone after adding it to a block.