Fix double base path in url

[kimhf]

This is a fix for the error described in issue #359

[rhysemmerson]

could you add a test for this?

[kimhf]

I have added a test that would have picked up on this issue.

[rhysemmerson]

getRequestUri() contains the query string whereas getPathInfo() doesn't. You might be able to replace this line with

 'url' => $request->fullUrl(),

fullUrl() appears to do what you want

    /**
     * Get the full URL for the request.
     *
     * @return string
     */
    public function fullUrl()
    {
        $query = $this->getQueryString();

        $question = $this->getBaseUrl().$this->getPathInfo() === '/' ? '/?' : '?';

        return $query ? $this->url().$question.$query : $this->url();
    }

[kimhf]

fullUrl seems to work on my initial tests, but also adds scheme/protocol and host to the url. This would break some of the other tests. The current change in this pull request ('url' => $request->getBaseUrl().$request->getPathInfo().$queryString,) would technically be a smaller change, but fullUrl might be better, but unsure if there are other consequences except for broken tests.

[billygl]

I changed to 'url' => $request->getRequestUri(), but I will test it sooner.

[NickSdot]

Would like to add this here as well: #359 (comment)

[mfusigh]

Could this be added in the next release? It's causing headaches in our testing environment.

[ngekoding]

Any solution for this? I just facing the same issue today when trying to get back with Laravel.

laravel/framework#49458

[taylordragoo]

Ridiculous nearly two years later and this is still an issue. As if I needed any more reasons to not use Inertia in my next app.

[DGINXREAL]

Please guys fix this errors. It's still not working and i have double wrong urls.

[ngekoding]

Please guys fix this errors. It's still not working and i have double wrong urls.

I use this forked version to solve this issue: https://github.com/feature-ninja/inertia-laravel

[jessarcher]

Thanks for the PR, and I'm sorry for the delay! I ended up going with a slightly different approach (#592), but this PR was very helpful, and I borrowed your test.