Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance the documentation with telegraf process run as root #2787

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2017

Conversation

djsly
Copy link
Contributor

@djsly djsly commented May 11, 2017

This is needed for specific procstat metrics

Required for all PRs:

  • CHANGELOG.md updated (we recommend not updating this until the PR has been approved by a maintainer)
  • Sign CLA (if not already signed)
  • README.md updated (if adding a new plugin)

@danielnelson
Copy link
Contributor

I think it is possible to get the field without root, I mentioned it recently on #517. However, I couldn't figure out how to get it working, can you take a look?

@djsly
Copy link
Contributor Author

djsly commented May 11, 2017

Should we document for now the limitation on those two specific fields until a better solution is found to avoid people from debugging to come to the same conclusion (thats what occured to me here :) )?

Unfortunately, I don't have time right now to look at the PTrace solution; but I could spend time eventually to dig more.

@danielnelson
Copy link
Contributor

I'd like to document the limitation, but I'm somewhat unsure of suggesting running as root.

@djsly
Copy link
Contributor Author

djsly commented May 11, 2017

yeah makes sense.. I tried playing around with user access before but couldn't get around it in the amount of time I spent.

the io and memory files access is set to 600 so I wasn't sure what more could be done.

@danielnelson danielnelson merged commit 9148871 into influxdata:master May 25, 2017
@danielnelson
Copy link
Contributor

Lets go with this for now.

@djsly
Copy link
Contributor Author

djsly commented May 25, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants