Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OP-1193 | OP-1194 | OP-1197 | OP-1198 | Update, Delete and validate Ward inventory #2085

Open
wants to merge 53 commits into
base: OP-1200-Wards-Inventory
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JantBogard
Copy link

@JantBogard JantBogard commented Nov 12, 2024

@mwithi
Copy link
Member

mwithi commented Nov 12, 2024

Please @JantBogard resolve conflicts with the update base branch

JantBogard and others added 9 commits November 25, 2024 14:55
…matici#2096)

* fix(OP-1043): Remove deleted group from user edit group jcombo box

* chore: Reformat code

---------

Co-authored-by: SteveGT96 <steve.tsala@intesys.it>
* Added option to mark medical type as active and add filter

* Title fixed

* Updated the CORE call to new type

* Fixed text
@mwithi
Copy link
Member

mwithi commented Dec 7, 2024

Please make possible to add ANY specific products (show the full list of not-deleted medicals)

image

@JantBogard
Copy link
Author

Please make possible to add ANY specific products (show the full list of not-deleted medicals)

image

Resolved

@mwithi
Copy link
Member

mwithi commented Dec 17, 2024

Found that Lot information is not saved:

Lot information inserted (note: empty code should be managed as AUTO)
image

Save
image

Press no
image

Edit
image

Lot information missing
image

@mwithi
Copy link
Member

mwithi commented Jan 8, 2025

It seems quite ok now, only one thing: a product with a new lot N should not be allowed with zero real quantity (because it doesn't make sense to define a new lot in that case).

@ArnaudFofou please can you verify that behaviour is at least similar with the already merged work of OP-1199?

@JantBogard
Copy link
Author

JantBogard commented Jan 9, 2025

It seems quite ok now, only one thing: a product with a new lot N should not be allowed with zero real quantity (because it doesn't make sense to define a new lot in that case).

@ArnaudFofou please can you verify that behaviour is at least similar with the already merged work of OP-1199?

I fixed it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants