fix: apply audit #229
fix: apply audit #229
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes mainly involve updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)NFT Genesis State Handling (New Flow)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Keeper
participant State
Client->>Keeper: InitGenesis(state)
Keeper->>State: Set ClassData
Keeper->>State: Set TokenData
Client-->>Keeper: ExportGenesis()
Keeper->>State: Get ClassData
Keeper->>State: Get TokenData
State-->>Keeper: Return Data
Keeper-->>Client: Return Genesis State
IBC Packet Permission ChecksequenceDiagram
participant IBCMiddleware
participant Keeper
IBCMiddleware->>Keeper: OnRecvPacket(packet)
Keeper->>Keeper: HasPermission(relayer)
alt Permission Granted
Keeper-->>IBCMiddleware: Continue Processing
else Permission Denied
Keeper-->>IBCMiddleware: Panic with Error
end
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
x/distribution/types/codec.go (1)
24-24: Issue:MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPooldoes not implement thesdk.Msginterface.The
MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPoolstruct is missing the required methods to implement thesdk.Msginterface. This is crucial for its correct operation within the SDK.
- Ensure that
MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPoolimplements the following methods:
Route() stringType() stringValidateBasic() errorGetSignBytes() []byteGetSigners() []sdk.AccAddressAnalysis chain
Ensure correct interface registration.
The registration of
MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPoolas an implementation ofsdk.Msgis crucial for its correct operation within the SDK. Ensure that this registration is reflected whereverMsgDepositValidatorRewardsPoolis used to maintain interface consistency.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool` is correctly recognized as an implementation of `sdk.Msg` across the codebase. # Test: Search for the implementation usage. Expect: Correct recognition and usage as `sdk.Msg`. rg --type go -A 5 $'MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool'Length of output: 77038
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool` implements `sdk.Msg` interface methods. # Test: Search for the implementation of `sdk.Msg` interface methods in `MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool`. rg --type go -A 5 'func (m \*MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool) Route\(\) string' rg --type go -A 5 'func (m \*MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool) Type\(\) string' rg --type go -A 5 'func (m \*MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool) ValidateBasic\(\) error' rg --type go -A 5 'func (m \*MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool) GetSignBytes\(\) \[\]byte' rg --type go -A 5 'func (m \*MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool) GetSigners\(\) \[\]sdk.AccAddress'Length of output: 436
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool` implements `sdk.Msg` interface methods. # Test: Search for the definition of `MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool` struct and list all its methods. rg --type go -A 10 'type MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool struct' rg --type go -A 10 'func (m \*MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool) 'Length of output: 2493
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all methods associated with `MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool` to check if it implements `sdk.Msg` interface. # Test: Search for all methods of `MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool`. rg --type go 'func (m \*MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool) 'Length of output: 59
x/ibc/perm/ibc_module.go (1)
160-167: Clarify error message for better user understanding.The error message "all packets of the channel
%sshould be relayed by the permissioned relayers" could be more descriptive. It should clarify why the packet cannot be relayed and what actions, if any, the user can take to correct this.- "all packets of the channel `%s` should be relayed by the permissioned relayers", + "Permission denied: The packet cannot be relayed on channel `%s` as it is not from a permissioned relayer. Please contact the network administrator.",x/mstaking/keeper/slash.go (1)
323-361: Review of new slashing logic inSlashRedelegationThe new logic introduced in
SlashRedelegationprioritizes slashing unbonding delegations over regular delegations. This is a significant change and seems to align with the intended behavior described in the summary. However, there are a few points to consider:
Correctness: The logic correctly checks if the unbonding delegation can be slashed before moving on to slash the delegation. This ensures that tokens that are in the process of unbonding are considered first, which might be crucial for maintaining the integrity of the slashing process.
Performance: The function iterates over entries in the unbonding delegation and delegation, which could be performance-intensive depending on the number of entries. It would be beneficial to monitor the performance of this section, especially under high load.
Error Handling: The function handles errors from
SetUnbondingDelegationbut does not log these errors. Adding logging for these errors could help with debugging and operational monitoring.Potential Improvement: Consider adding more detailed comments explaining why unbonding delegations are prioritized over delegations. This will help future maintainers understand the reasoning behind this design choice.
Overall, the changes appear sound, but adding more detailed logging and comments would enhance maintainability and debuggability.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
x/distribution/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.gox/ibc/nft-transfer/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (17)
- proto/ibc/applications/nft_transfer/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/initia/distribution/v1/tx.proto (1 hunks)
- x/bank/keeper/grpc_query.go (2 hunks)
- x/distribution/keeper/allocation.go (1 hunks)
- x/distribution/types/codec.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/abci.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/deposit.go (10 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/proposal.go (11 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/tally.go (5 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/vote.go (4 hunks)
- x/gov/types/params.go (1 hunks)
- x/ibc/nft-transfer/keeper/genesis.go (4 hunks)
- x/ibc/perm/ibc_module.go (1 hunks)
- x/ibc/perm/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/mstaking/keeper/slash.go (1 hunks)
- x/mstaking/types/authz.go (2 hunks)
- x/reward/abci.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (16)
x/distribution/types/codec.go (1)
16-16: Verify registration under shortened alias.The message type
MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPoolis registered with a shortened alias due to Amino's rejection of long type names. While this resolves the immediate issue, it's crucial to verify that this alias does not conflict with other aliases and that it is consistently used across the codebase where relevant.Verification successful
Alias 'distr/MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool' is unique and consistently used.
- The alias 'distr/MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool' is registered in
x/distribution/types/codec.go.- It is also defined as an option in
proto/initia/distribution/v1/tx.proto.There are no conflicts or additional usages found in the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the alias 'distr/MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool' is unique and consistently used. # Test: Search for the alias usage. Expect: Only occurrences linked to MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool. rg --type go -A 5 $'distr/MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool'Length of output: 546
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Comprehensive search for the alias 'distr/MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool' to ensure uniqueness and consistent usage across the codebase. # Test: Search for the alias usage across the entire codebase. rg 'distr/MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool'Length of output: 288
proto/ibc/applications/nft_transfer/v1/genesis.proto (2)
26-28: Ensure correct definition and usage ofClassDataandTokenData.The new message types
ClassDataandTokenDataare introduced to handle class and token data respectively. It's crucial to ensure that these types are used correctly throughout the codebase, particularly in functions that handle genesis data.Also applies to: 34-36
Verification successful
Verification successful: Correct definition and usage of
ClassDataandTokenData.The
ClassDataandTokenDatamessage types are correctly defined and consistently used throughout the codebase, including in genesis handling functions and various tests.
proto/ibc/applications/nft_transfer/v1/genesis.protox/ibc/nft-transfer/keeper/genesis.gox/ibc/nft-transfer/keeper/relay.gox/ibc/nft-transfer/keeper/keeper.gox/ibc/nft-transfer/types/genesis.pb.gox/ibc/nft-transfer/types/packet.pb.gox/ibc/nft-transfer/types/ibc.gox/ibc-hooks/move-hooks/timeout_test.gox/ibc-hooks/move-hooks/ack_test.gox/ibc-hooks/move-hooks/receive_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `ClassData` and `TokenData` are defined and used correctly. # Test: Search for the usage of `ClassData` and `TokenData`. Expect: Correct definition and consistent usage. rg --type proto -A 5 $'ClassData|TokenData'Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `ClassData` and `TokenData` are defined and used correctly. # Test: Search for the definition and usage of `ClassData` and `TokenData` in .proto files. rg 'ClassData|TokenData' --glob '*.proto' -A 5Length of output: 1723
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `ClassData` and `TokenData` are used correctly throughout the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `ClassData` and `TokenData` in the codebase. rg 'ClassData|TokenData' -A 5Length of output: 51905
18-19: Review the updatedGenesisStatestructure.The replacement of the
Paramsfield withclass_dataandtoken_dataarrays inGenesisStateis a significant change. Ensure that all references to the oldParamsfield are updated to accommodate this new structure. Additionally, validate that the serialization and deserialization processes handle these repeated fields correctly.Also applies to: 21-21
x/gov/keeper/vote.go (1)
16-16: Review changes in receiver variable names.The renaming of the receiver variable from
keepertokin theAddVoteanddeleteVotesfunctions is a minor change but requires careful attention to ensure that all references within these functions are updated accordingly. Verify that the new variable namekdoes not introduce any scope or access issues.Also applies to: 64-64
x/ibc/nft-transfer/keeper/genesis.go (2)
7-7: Review new imports.The addition of
cosmossdk.io/collectionsandgithub.com/initia-labs/initia/x/ibc/nft-transfer/typesimports should be verified to ensure that they are necessary and used appropriately throughout the file. Particularly, check that thecollectionspackage is used efficiently in the new logic.Verification successful
New imports are used appropriately.
The imports
cosmossdk.io/collectionsandgithub.com/initia-labs/initia/x/ibc/nft-transfer/typesare effectively utilized within thex/ibc/nft-transfer/keeper/genesis.gofile:
cosmossdk.io/collectionsis used for operations involving thecollectionspackage.github.com/initia-labs/initia/x/ibc/nft-transfer/typesis used for handling types specific to the NFT transfer logic.These usages confirm that the imports are necessary and used appropriately.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new imports are used effectively. # Test: Search for the usage of the new imports. Expect: Effective and necessary usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'cosmossdk.io/collections|github.com/initia-labs/initia/x/ibc/nft-transfer/types'Length of output: 33188
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new imports in the specific file `x/ibc/nft-transfer/keeper/genesis.go`. # Test: Search for the usage of the `cosmossdk.io/collections` and `github.com/initia-labs/initia/x/ibc/nft-transfer/types` imports in the target file. rg --type go --no-heading --line-number --color never 'collections|nft-transfer/types' x/ibc/nft-transfer/keeper/genesis.goLength of output: 437
23-33: Ensure correct handling ofClassDataandTokenData.The modifications in
InitGenesisandExportGenesisto incorporateClassDataandTokenDatahandling are substantial. Verify that these changes do not introduce any logical errors or inefficiencies, particularly in the loops and data retrieval functions. Additionally, ensure that the new structure of theGenesisStatereturn value inExportGenesiscorrectly reflects the added data.Also applies to: 63-91
proto/initia/distribution/v1/tx.proto (1)
50-50: Approved: Update toamino.nameinMsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool.The change in the
amino.nameoption is noted and approved.However, ensure that all references and usages of this message type are updated accordingly.
Verification successful
Verified: Update to
amino.nameinMsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool.The change in the
amino.nameoption has been successfully propagated throughout the codebase. No occurrences of the old message type name were found.
x/distribution/types/codec.goproto/initia/distribution/v1/tx.protoScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the updated message type is correctly handled in the codebase. # Test: Search for the old and new message type names. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type proto -A 5 $'distr/MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool' rg --type proto -A 5 $'cosmos-sdk/distr/MsgDepositValRewards'Length of output: 180
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the updated message type is correctly handled in the codebase. # Test: Search for the old and new message type names. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg -A 5 'distr/MsgDepositValidatorRewardsPool' rg -A 5 'cosmos-sdk/distr/MsgDepositValRewards'Length of output: 1030
x/ibc/perm/keeper/keeper.go (1)
101-102: Verify the default permission logic.Allowing all relayers by default when no permissioned relayers are set is a significant change.
Ensure this behavior is clearly documented to avoid security misunderstandings.
Would you like me to draft the documentation for this change?
x/gov/types/params.go (1)
111-111: Ensure the validation logic is correctly implemented.The change to require the expedited minimum deposit to be greater than the minimum deposit is correctly implemented. This aligns with the PR objectives and enhances the validation logic.
x/gov/keeper/proposal.go (1)
22-36: Review of receiver variable changes and method updates inproposal.go.The changes to use the receiver
kinstead ofkeeperare consistently applied across all the methods in this file. This is a straightforward refactor and does not change the logic of the methods.Also applies to: 56-66, 75-75, 97-102, 115-115, 119-119, 125-125, 142-144, 172-172, 177-177, 183-183, 188-188, 193-193, 203-203, 205-205, 210-210, 216-216, 220-220, 221-221, 227-227, 233-233, 238-238, 244-244, 249-249, 256-256, 260-260, 265-265, 279-279, 284-284, 289-289, 296-296, 300-300, 310-310, 315-315, 320-320
x/gov/keeper/deposit.go (1)
22-27: Review of receiver variable changes and method updates indeposit.go.The changes to use the receiver
kinstead ofkeeperare consistently applied across all the methods in this file. This is a straightforward refactor and does not change the logic of the methods.Also applies to: 31-32, 40-44, 50-50, 54-56, 65-67, 78-78, 126-126, 133-133, 141-141, 148-148, 156-156, 163-163, 177-178, 182-182, 191-191, 197-197, 208-208, 212-212, 218-218, 243-243, 250-250, 259-259, 263-263, 268-268, 273-273, 277-277, 290-290, 291-291, 293-293, 297-297
x/gov/abci.go (1)
133-136: Ensure the handling of emergency proposals is correctly implemented.The change to return early for emergency proposals in the
EndBlockerfunction is correctly implemented. This prevents emergency proposals from undergoing the tallying process, which aligns with the PR objectives.x/gov/keeper/tally.go (2)
22-22: Review of function signature change:The change from
keepertokas the receiver variable is a minor, stylistic adjustment that improves consistency if it matches other methods in theKeeperstruct.
23-23: Review of method calls with updated receiver variable:All method calls within the
Tallyfunction now use thekreceiver variable consistently. This change should not affect functionality but does improve readability and consistency across the codebase.Also applies to: 39-39, 63-63, 74-74, 107-107
x/distribution/keeper/allocation.go (1)
89-98: Review of updates in theAllocateTokensfunction:The changes to skip allocation when
poolSizeorbondedTokens.Amountare zero are crucial for robustness. These checks prevent divisions by zero and other mathematical errors, which are essential for the stability of the token distribution logic.Also applies to: 103-103
x/bank/keeper/grpc_query.go (1)
189-189: Simplification of error handling inDenomMetadata:Removing the fetching of metadata if not found and directly returning an error simplifies the function. This change should make the function more predictable and easier to maintain, assuming that clients handle these errors appropriately.
x/ibc/perm/ibc_module.go
Outdated
| if ok, err := im.keeper.HasPermission(ctx, packet.DestinationPort, packet.DestinationChannel, relayer); err != nil { | ||
| return newEmitErrorAcknowledgement(ctx, err) | ||
| } else if !ok { | ||
| panic(fmt.Errorf( | ||
| "all packets of the channel `%s` should be relayed by the permissioned relayers", | ||
| packet.DestinationChannel, | ||
| )) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential improvement in error handling consistency.
The function newEmitErrorAcknowledgement is used to handle errors in one branch but not consistently across all error scenarios. Consider using this function consistently for all error conditions to maintain uniform error handling across the module.
- panic(fmt.Errorf(
- "all packets of the channel `%s` should be relayed by the permissioned relayers",
- packet.DestinationChannel,
- ))
+ return newEmitErrorAcknowledgement(ctx, fmt.Errorf(
+ "all packets of the channel `%s` should be relayed by the permissioned relayers",
+ packet.DestinationChannel,
+ ))Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if ok, err := im.keeper.HasPermission(ctx, packet.DestinationPort, packet.DestinationChannel, relayer); err != nil { | |
| return newEmitErrorAcknowledgement(ctx, err) | |
| } else if !ok { | |
| panic(fmt.Errorf( | |
| "all packets of the channel `%s` should be relayed by the permissioned relayers", | |
| packet.DestinationChannel, | |
| )) | |
| } | |
| if ok, err := im.keeper.HasPermission(ctx, packet.DestinationPort, packet.DestinationChannel, relayer); err != nil { | |
| return newEmitErrorAcknowledgement(ctx, err) | |
| } else if !ok { | |
| return newEmitErrorAcknowledgement(ctx, fmt.Errorf( | |
| "all packets of the channel `%s` should be relayed by the permissioned relayers", | |
| packet.DestinationChannel, | |
| )) | |
| } |
Consider replacing panic with a more graceful error handling approach.
Using panic can lead to abrupt termination of the application, which might not be desirable, especially in a distributed system like a blockchain where stability is crucial. Consider returning an error or a specific error acknowledgement instead.
- panic(fmt.Errorf(
- "all packets of the channel `%s` should be relayed by the permissioned relayers",
- packet.DestinationChannel,
- ))
+ return newEmitErrorAcknowledgement(ctx, fmt.Errorf(
+ "all packets of the channel `%s` should be relayed by the permissioned relayers",
+ packet.DestinationChannel,
+ ))Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if ok, err := im.keeper.HasPermission(ctx, packet.DestinationPort, packet.DestinationChannel, relayer); err != nil { | |
| return newEmitErrorAcknowledgement(ctx, err) | |
| } else if !ok { | |
| panic(fmt.Errorf( | |
| "all packets of the channel `%s` should be relayed by the permissioned relayers", | |
| packet.DestinationChannel, | |
| )) | |
| } | |
| if ok, err := im.keeper.HasPermission(ctx, packet.DestinationPort, packet.DestinationChannel, relayer); err != nil { | |
| return newEmitErrorAcknowledgement(ctx, err) | |
| } else if !ok { | |
| return newEmitErrorAcknowledgement(ctx, fmt.Errorf( | |
| "all packets of the channel `%s` should be relayed by the permissioned relayers", | |
| packet.DestinationChannel, | |
| )) | |
| } |
| if releaseRate.IsNegative() { | ||
| releaseRate = math.LegacyZeroDec() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved: Ensuring non-negative releaseRate.
The addition of a check to ensure releaseRate is non-negative is a good safety measure.
Consider adding unit tests to verify this behavior.
Would you like me to help in writing these tests or should I open a GitHub issue to track this task?
| case *MsgCancelUnbondingDelegation: | ||
| validatorAddress = msg.ValidatorAddress | ||
| amount = msg.Amount |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved: Handling of MsgCancelUnbondingDelegation in StakeAuthorization.
The update to handle MsgCancelUnbondingDelegation messages is a logical extension of the existing functionality.
Ensure this new handling is covered by unit tests to verify its correctness.
Would you like assistance in creating these tests, or should I open a GitHub issue to track this task?
| @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ import ( | |||
|
|
|||
| // Tally iterates over the votes and updates the tally of a proposal based on the voting power of the | |||
| // voters | |||
| func (keeper Keeper) Tally(ctx context.Context, params customtypes.Params, proposal customtypes.Proposal) (quorumReached, passed bool, burnDeposits bool, tallyResults v1.TallyResult, err error) { | |||
| weights, err := keeper.sk.GetVotingPowerWeights(ctx) | |||
| func (k Keeper) Tally(ctx context.Context, params customtypes.Params, proposal customtypes.Proposal) (quorumReached, passed bool, burnDeposits bool, tallyResults v1.TallyResult, err error) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider breaking down the Tally function:
The TODO comment suggests breaking the function into smaller parts for better clarity. This is a valid suggestion given the complexity and length of the function.
Consider refactoring Tally into smaller, more manageable functions that handle specific parts of the tallying process. This will improve maintainability and testability.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #229 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 40.24% 40.13% -0.11%
==========================================
Files 259 259
Lines 24643 24712 +69
==========================================
+ Hits 9918 9919 +1
- Misses 13191 13249 +58
- Partials 1534 1544 +10
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- x/gov/keeper/common_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/types/params.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/gov/types/params.go
Additional comments not posted (1)
x/gov/keeper/common_test.go (1)
435-435: Proper initialization ofExpeditedMinDepositfield.The change to initialize the
ExpeditedMinDepositfield withbondDenomaligns with the existing pattern of usingbondDenomfor other deposit types. This standardization is beneficial for consistency across different types of governance proposals.However, ensure to verify the impact of this new field on the governance module's functionality, especially in scenarios where expedited processing is required.
Verification successful
Proper initialization of
ExpeditedMinDepositfield.The change to initialize the
ExpeditedMinDepositfield withbondDenomaligns with the existing pattern of usingbondDenomfor other deposit types. This standardization is beneficial for consistency across different types of governance proposals.The search results confirm that the
ExpeditedMinDepositfield is properly integrated and validated across the codebase, indicating no immediate issues with this change.
x/gov/types/params.go: Validation and assignment ofExpeditedMinDeposit.x/gov/types/proposal.go: Utilization ofExpeditedMinDepositin proposal logic.x/gov/types/gov.pb.go: Protobuf serialization and getter methods forExpeditedMinDeposit.x/gov/keeper/deposit.go: Handling ofExpeditedMinDepositin deposit logic.x/gov/genesis_test.go,x/gov/keeper/common_test.go,app/genesis.go: Initialization in test and genesis setup.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the new `ExpeditedMinDeposit` field on governance functionality. # Test: Search for the use of `ExpeditedMinDeposit` in governance logic. Expect: Proper handling and checks. rg --type go -A 5 $'ExpeditedMinDeposit'Length of output: 13093
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.modis excluded by!**/*.modgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum,!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/ibc/nft-transfer/keeper/genesis.go (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/ibc/nft-transfer/keeper/genesis.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/ibc/perm/ibc_module.go (3 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
x/ibc/perm/ibc_module.go
[warning] 176-176: x/ibc/perm/ibc_module.go#L176
Added line #L176 was not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (2)
x/ibc/perm/ibc_module.go (2)
158-160: Ensure consistent error handling.Consider using
newEmitErrorAcknowledgementconsistently for all error conditions to maintain uniform error handling across the module.- panic(fmt.Errorf( - "all packets of the channel `%s` should be relayed by the permissioned relayers", - packet.DestinationChannel, - )) + return newEmitErrorAcknowledgement(ctx, fmt.Errorf( + "all packets of the channel `%s` should be relayed by the permissioned relayers", + packet.DestinationChannel, + ))
176-176: Replacepanicwith a more graceful error handling approach.Using
paniccan lead to abrupt termination of the application, which might not be desirable, especially in a distributed system like a blockchain where stability is crucial. Consider returning an error or a specific error acknowledgement instead.- panic(fmt.Errorf( - "all packets of the channel `%s` should be relayed by the permissioned relayers", - packet.DestinationChannel, - )) + return newEmitErrorAcknowledgement(ctx, fmt.Errorf( + "all packets of the channel `%s` should be relayed by the permissioned relayers", + packet.DestinationChannel, + ))Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 176-176: x/ibc/perm/ibc_module.go#L176
Added line #L176 was not covered by tests
No description provided.