Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: refactor app struct #60

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 14, 2024
Merged

feat: refactor app struct #60

merged 8 commits into from
Aug 14, 2024

Conversation

beer-1
Copy link
Member

@beer-1 beer-1 commented Aug 2, 2024

Description

need to wait until initia-labs/cometbft#5 merged.

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a blockchain application management system with improved transaction lane and mempool handling.
    • Added an indexing mechanism to efficiently manage and respond to blockchain events.
    • Implemented new API endpoints for Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) and enhanced currency pair queries.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced error handling during application setup for increased robustness.
  • Chores
    • Updated dependencies to their latest versions for improved compatibility and functionality.

@beer-1 beer-1 self-assigned this Aug 2, 2024
@beer-1 beer-1 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 2, 2024 03:51
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the architecture and functionality of the blockchain application through significant restructuring, improved error handling, and the introduction of modular features. Key updates include refined keeper management, a robust indexing mechanism, and dependency upgrades to leverage the latest enhancements. This strategic overhaul aims to bolster maintainability, performance, and operational resilience within the Cosmos SDK ecosystem, ultimately improving the application's efficiency and clarity.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/*.yml Updated comments and syntax for environment variable referencing; Go version changed to 1.22.5.
app/app.go Restructured MinitiaApp, improved keeper management, simplified initialization, and enhanced error handling.
app/indexer.go, app/blocksdk.go Introduced new functions for indexing and transaction handling, enhancing modular architecture.
go.mod Updated Go version to 1.22.5 and upgraded several dependencies, improving compatibility and functionality.
client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml Added new API endpoints and refined existing ones for better clarity and functionality.
Dockerfile Updated base image from golang:1.22-alpine3.18 to golang:1.22-alpine3.19 for improvements.
README.md Updated Go version requirement from v1.22.2 to v1.22.5.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant App as MinitiaApp
    participant Keeper as AppKeepers
    participant Indexer as Indexer

    App->>Keeper: Initialize application keepers
    Keeper->>App: Setup necessary keepers
    App->>Indexer: Initialize indexing mechanism
    Indexer->>App: Register indexing components
Loading

🐰 In the garden, changes bloom bright,
With keepers and lanes, all set just right.
New paths for the mempool, fresh trees for the code,
Hopping through updates, lightening the load.
Celebrate progress, let our joy ring,
For every new feature, the rabbit will sing! 🥕


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.73418% with 89 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 64.40%. Comparing base (8292b87) to head (3399831).

Files Patch % Lines
app/indexer.go 33.33% 32 Missing and 8 partials ⚠️
app/app.go 61.53% 30 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
app/blocksdk.go 94.64% 4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
app/keepers/keepers.go 98.59% 4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
app/keepers/keys.go 93.54% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #60      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   64.26%   64.40%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          35       40       +5     
  Lines        3098     3222     +124     
==========================================
+ Hits         1991     2075      +84     
- Misses        937      972      +35     
- Partials      170      175       +5     
Files Coverage Δ
app/modules.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
app/keepers/keys.go 93.54% <93.54%> (ø)
app/blocksdk.go 94.64% <94.64%> (ø)
app/keepers/keepers.go 98.59% <98.59%> (ø)
app/app.go 56.41% <61.53%> (-26.00%) ⬇️
app/indexer.go 33.33% <33.33%> (ø)

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 13

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
app/keepers/keys.go (1)

55-67: Verify key initialization.

The following keys are missing in app/keepers/keys.go and should be included to ensure all necessary modules are covered:

  • distributiontypes.StoreKey
  • govtypes.StoreKey
  • stakingtypes.StoreKey

Please add these keys to the GenerateKeys function.

Analysis chain

Verify key initialization.

Ensure that all necessary keys for the modules are included and correctly initialized.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the initialization of keys for various modules.

# Test: Search for the keys initialization. Expect: All necessary keys are included.
rg --type go -A 5 $'NewKVStoreKeys'

Length of output: 2048


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all keys used in the repository to verify against the keys initialized in app/keepers/keys.go

# Find all instances of StoreKey definitions
rg --type go 'StoreKey' -A 0

Length of output: 7809


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract and list all unique StoreKey definitions used in the repository to verify against the keys initialized in app/keepers/keys.go

# Extract all unique StoreKey definitions
rg --type go 'StoreKey' -A 0 | grep -oP '\w+types.StoreKey' | sort | uniq

Length of output: 629

app/modules.go (2)

140-159: Include distr module in orderBeginBlockers.

The distr module is mentioned in the comments as necessary for the correct order of BeginBlockers but is not included in the orderBeginBlockers function. Please include distr in the orderBeginBlockers function to align with the documented requirements.

  • app/modules.go: Include distr module in the orderBeginBlockers function.
Analysis chain

Verify order of BeginBlockers.

Ensure that the order of BeginBlockers is correctly defined.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the order of BeginBlockers.

# Test: Check for the order of BeginBlockers. Expect: Correct order of BeginBlockers.
rg --type go -A 5 'orderBeginBlockers'

Length of output: 1089


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence of distr module and other relevant modules in BeginBlockers.

# Search for the 'distr' module in the codebase
rg --type go 'distr'

# Search for other relevant modules mentioned in comments or documentation
rg --type go 'BeginBlocker'

Length of output: 1146


161-179: Missing staking and provider modules in orderEndBlockers function

The staking and provider modules are not included in the orderEndBlockers function, which contradicts the specified requirements in the comments. Ensure that staking.EndBlock is executed before provider.EndBlock, and gov.EndBlock is executed before staking.EndBlock.

  • app/modules.go: Add staking and provider modules to the orderEndBlockers function in the correct order.
Analysis chain

Verify order of EndBlockers.

Ensure that the order of EndBlockers is correctly defined.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the order of EndBlockers.

# Test: Check for the order of EndBlockers. Expect: Correct order of EndBlockers.
rg --type go -A 5 'orderEndBlockers'

Length of output: 618


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence and order of staking and provider modules in the orderEndBlockers function.

# Search for the definition of the orderEndBlockers function and include more lines to capture the entire list.
rg --type go -A 20 'func orderEndBlockers() []string'

# Search for the usage of staking and provider modules in the codebase to ensure they are included and ordered correctly.
rg --type go 'staking' 'provider'

Length of output: 255


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence and order of staking and provider modules in the orderEndBlockers function.

# Search for the definition of the orderEndBlockers function and include more lines to capture the entire list.
rg --type go -A 20 'func orderEndBlockers\(\) \[\]string'

# Search for the usage of staking and provider modules in the codebase to ensure they are included and ordered correctly.
rg --type go 'staking' 
rg --type go 'provider'

Length of output: 2810

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8292b87 and d094f14.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (10)
  • .github/workflows/build-linux-arm64.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks)
  • app/app.go (19 hunks)
  • app/app_test.go (1 hunks)
  • app/blocksdk.go (1 hunks)
  • app/indexer.go (1 hunks)
  • app/keepers/keepers.go (1 hunks)
  • app/keepers/keys.go (1 hunks)
  • app/modules.go (1 hunks)
  • go.mod (11 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/build-linux-arm64.yml
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
app/indexer.go

[warning] 28-29: app/indexer.go#L28-L29
Added lines #L28 - L29 were not covered by tests


[warning] 41-42: app/indexer.go#L41-L42
Added lines #L41 - L42 were not covered by tests


[warning] 45-46: app/indexer.go#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests


[warning] 49-50: app/indexer.go#L49-L50
Added lines #L49 - L50 were not covered by tests


[warning] 53-54: app/indexer.go#L53-L54
Added lines #L53 - L54 were not covered by tests


[warning] 57-58: app/indexer.go#L57-L58
Added lines #L57 - L58 were not covered by tests


[warning] 67-69: app/indexer.go#L67-L69
Added lines #L67 - L69 were not covered by tests


[warning] 71-73: app/indexer.go#L71-L73
Added lines #L71 - L73 were not covered by tests


[warning] 75-77: app/indexer.go#L75-L77
Added lines #L75 - L77 were not covered by tests


[warning] 79-81: app/indexer.go#L79-L81
Added lines #L79 - L81 were not covered by tests


[warning] 83-89: app/indexer.go#L83-L89
Added lines #L83 - L89 were not covered by tests

app/blocksdk.go

[warning] 86-87: app/blocksdk.go#L86-L87
Added lines #L86 - L87 were not covered by tests


[warning] 110-111: app/blocksdk.go#L110-L111
Added lines #L110 - L111 were not covered by tests

app/app.go

[warning] 94-94: app/app.go#L94
Added line #L94 was not covered by tests


[warning] 172-172: app/app.go#L172
Added line #L172 was not covered by tests


[warning] 250-250: app/app.go#L250
Added line #L250 was not covered by tests


[warning] 255-255: app/app.go#L255
Added line #L255 was not covered by tests


[warning] 257-262: app/app.go#L257-L262
Added lines #L257 - L262 were not covered by tests


[warning] 270-271: app/app.go#L270-L271
Added lines #L270 - L271 were not covered by tests


[warning] 277-277: app/app.go#L277
Added line #L277 was not covered by tests


[warning] 297-297: app/app.go#L297
Added line #L297 was not covered by tests


[warning] 317-317: app/app.go#L317
Added line #L317 was not covered by tests


[warning] 387-387: app/app.go#L387
Added line #L387 was not covered by tests


[warning] 394-397: app/app.go#L394-L397
Added lines #L394 - L397 were not covered by tests


[warning] 422-422: app/app.go#L422
Added line #L422 was not covered by tests


[warning] 425-425: app/app.go#L425
Added line #L425 was not covered by tests


[warning] 453-454: app/app.go#L453-L454
Added lines #L453 - L454 were not covered by tests


[warning] 499-501: app/app.go#L499-L501
Added lines #L499 - L501 were not covered by tests


[warning] 541-541: app/app.go#L541
Added line #L541 was not covered by tests


[warning] 604-605: app/app.go#L604-L605
Added lines #L604 - L605 were not covered by tests

Additional comments not posted (52)
app/keepers/keys.go (6)

76-78: LGTM!

The function correctly returns the KV store keys.


80-82: LGTM!

The function correctly returns the transient store keys.


84-86: LGTM!

The function correctly returns the memory store keys.


91-93: LGTM!

The function correctly returns the KV store key for the provided store key.


98-100: LGTM!

The function correctly returns the transient store key for the provided store key.


105-107: LGTM!

The function correctly returns the memory store key for the provided store key.

app/app_test.go (5)

Line range hint 55-57:
LGTM!

The function correctly tests the module account permissions.


Line range hint 59-94:
LGTM!

The function correctly tests the initialization of genesis on migration.


Line range hint 96-110:
LGTM!

The function correctly tests the upgrade state on genesis.


Line range hint 112-117:
LGTM!

The function correctly tests the retrieval of keys.


Line range hint 44-52:
Verify the new logic for retrieving blocked module account addresses.

The logic for retrieving blocked module account addresses has been modified to enhance accuracy. Verify the correctness of this new logic.

Verification successful

Verification successful for retrieving blocked module account addresses.

The new logic in app/app_test.go correctly processes the blocked module account addresses by converting them from Bech32 format or retrieving them from the account keeper if conversion fails.

  • The BlockedModuleAccountAddrs function in app/app.go removes allowed module accounts from the provided map and returns the blocked addresses.
  • The test logic in app/app_test.go iterates over these addresses and handles them appropriately.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new logic for retrieving blocked module account addresses.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct logic for retrieving blocked module account addresses.
rg --type go -A 5 $'BlockedModuleAccountAddrs'

Length of output: 1154


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the full implementation of the BlockedModuleAccountAddrs function.

# Extract the implementation of BlockedModuleAccountAddrs from app/app.go
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (app *MinitiaApp) BlockedModuleAccountAddrs($_) $_' --after 20

Length of output: 1604

app/blocksdk.go (4)

55-63: Verify lane initialization parameters.

Ensure that the parameters for initializing mevLane are correctly configured, especially MaxBlockSpace and MaxTxs.

Verification successful

Parameters for mevLane initialization are correctly configured.

The values MaxBlockSpace set to math.LegacyMustNewDecFromStr("0.09") and MaxTxs set to 100 are valid configurations based on the codebase.

  • MaxBlockSpace: 0.09 is one of the valid values.
  • MaxTxs: 100 is one of the valid values.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the parameters used for initializing mevLane.

# Test: Check for the initialization of mevLane. Expect: Correct parameters for MaxBlockSpace and MaxTxs.
rg --type go -A 5 'mevlane.NewMEVLane'

Length of output: 391


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for references to MaxBlockSpace in the codebase to verify its expected value.
rg --type go 'MaxBlockSpace'

# Search for references to MaxTxs in the codebase to verify its expected value.
rg --type go 'MaxTxs'

Length of output: 992


65-72: Verify lane initialization parameters.

Ensure that the parameters for initializing freeLane are correctly configured, especially MaxBlockSpace and MaxTxs.


74-81: Verify lane initialization parameters.

Ensure that the parameters for initializing defaultLane are correctly configured, especially MaxBlockSpace and MaxTxs.


46-53: Verify lane initialization parameters.

Ensure that the parameters for initializing systemLane are correctly configured, especially MaxBlockSpace and MaxTxs.

Verification successful

Verification of lane initialization parameters

The parameters for initializing systemLane with MaxBlockSpace set to math.LegacyMustNewDecFromStr("0.01") and MaxTxs set to 1 appear to be correctly configured based on the context provided and the external package blockbase.

  • MaxBlockSpace: math.LegacyMustNewDecFromStr("0.01")
  • MaxTxs: 1
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the parameters used for initializing systemLane.

# Test: Check for the initialization of systemLane. Expect: Correct parameters for MaxBlockSpace and MaxTxs.
rg --type go -A 5 'initialanes.NewSystemLane'

Length of output: 406


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the definitions and expected values for MaxBlockSpace and MaxTxs in blockbase.LaneConfig

# Search for the definition of LaneConfig in the blockbase package
rg --type go 'type LaneConfig struct' -A 10

# Search for references to MaxBlockSpace and MaxTxs in the codebase to understand their expected values
rg --type go 'MaxBlockSpace'
rg --type go 'MaxTxs'

Length of output: 1038


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the definition of LaneConfig in the entire codebase

# Search for the term LaneConfig across the entire codebase to find its definition and context
rg --type go 'LaneConfig'

Length of output: 329


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the term blockbase to locate the package or file that defines LaneConfig

# Search for the term blockbase across the entire codebase
rg --type go 'blockbase'

Length of output: 695

app/modules.go (4)

72-89: Verify module account permissions.

Ensure that the permissions for each module account are correctly configured.


126-138: Verify basic manager setup.

Ensure that the basic manager is correctly set up with the necessary modules and interfaces.

Verification successful

Verify the correct setup and usage of the Basic Manager.

Ensure that the BasicModuleManager is correctly set up with the necessary modules and interfaces and is used appropriately throughout the application.


Verified: Basic Manager setup and usage.

The BasicModuleManager is correctly set up with the necessary modules and interfaces and is used appropriately throughout the application.

  • The newBasicManagerFromManager function initializes the BasicModuleManager with the necessary modules and interfaces.
  • The BasicModuleManager is used in key parts of the application, including setting up module operations and GRPC Gateway routes.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the setup of the basic manager.

# Test: Check for the setup of the basic manager. Expect: Correct setup of the basic manager with necessary modules and interfaces.
rg --type go -A 5 'newBasicManagerFromManager'

Length of output: 667


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the setup and usage of the Basic Manager.

# Test: Check for the setup of the Basic Manager in app/app.go. Expect: Proper configuration and usage of BasicModuleManager.
rg --type go 'BasicModuleManager' -A 5

# Test: Check for the usage of the newBasicManagerFromManager function. Expect: Proper usage throughout the application.
rg --type go 'newBasicManagerFromManager' -A 10

Length of output: 2825


91-123: Verify app modules inclusion and initialization.

Ensure that all necessary app modules are included and correctly initialized.

Verification successful

All necessary app modules are correctly included and initialized.

The appModules function in app/modules.go correctly includes and initializes all necessary app modules.

  • The modules are properly defined and initialized within the function.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the inclusion and initialization of app modules.

# Test: Check for the inclusion and initialization of app modules. Expect: Correct inclusion and initialization of all necessary app modules.
rg --type go -A 5 'appModules'

Length of output: 786


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the definitions and initializations of each module within the appModules function.

# List of modules to verify
modules=(
  "auth.NewAppModule"
  "bank.NewAppModule"
  "opchild.NewAppModule"
  "capability.NewAppModule"
  "crisis.NewAppModule"
  "feegrantmodule.NewAppModule"
  "upgrade.NewAppModule"
  "authzmodule.NewAppModule"
  "groupmodule.NewAppModule"
  "consensus.NewAppModule"
  "wasm.NewAppModule"
  "auction.NewAppModule"
  "tokenfactory.NewAppModule"
  "ibc.NewAppModule"
  "ibctransfer.NewAppModule"
  "ica.NewAppModule"
  "icaauth.NewAppModule"
  "ibcfee.NewAppModule"
  "ibctm.NewAppModule"
  "solomachine.NewAppModule"
  "packetforward.NewAppModule"
  "ibchooks.NewAppModule"
  "forwarding.NewAppModule"
  "oracle.NewAppModule"
  "marketmap.NewAppModule"
)

# Verify each module definition and initialization
for module in "${modules[@]}"; do
  echo "Verifying $module..."
  rg --type go -A 5 "$module"
done

Length of output: 17033


182-200: Verify order of InitBlockers.

Ensure that the order of InitBlockers is correctly defined.

Verification successful

Verified order of InitBlockers.

The order of InitBlockers in the orderInitBlockers function is correctly defined according to the comments in the code.

  • capabilitytypes.ModuleName is first.
  • genutiltypes.ModuleName is placed after authtypes.ModuleName.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the order of InitBlockers.

# Test: Check for the order of InitBlockers. Expect: Correct order of InitBlockers.
rg --type go -A 5 'orderInitBlockers'

Length of output: 860


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the order of InitBlockers from the function definition
rg --type go -A 20 'func orderInitBlockers() \[\]string {' app/modules.go | grep -oP '\w+types\.ModuleName' | tr '\n' ' '

Length of output: 261


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the order of InitBlockers from the function definition with corrected regex
rg --type go -A 20 'func orderInitBlockers\(\) \[\]string {' app/modules.go | grep -oP '\w+types\.ModuleName' | tr '\n' ' '

Length of output: 267


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract lines containing ModuleName from the orderInitBlockers function definition
rg --type go -A 20 'func orderInitBlockers' app/modules.go | grep 'ModuleName'

Length of output: 690

go.mod (6)

3-3: LGTM! Go version update.

The Go version has been updated from 1.22 to 1.22.0.


23-23: Verify compatibility of github.com/cometbft/cometbft update.

Ensure that the update from v0.38.7 to v0.38.10 is compatible and brings improvements.


26-26: Verify compatibility of github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk update.

Ensure that the update from v0.50.7 to v0.50.8 is compatible and brings improvements.


19-19: Verify compatibility of cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade update.

Ensure that the update from v0.1.1 to v0.1.3 is compatible and brings improvements.


50-50: Verify compatibility of github.com/skip-mev/slinky update.

Ensure that the update from v0.4.3 to v1.0.5 is compatible and brings improvements.


28-28: Verify compatibility of github.com/cosmos/gogoproto update.

Ensure that the update from v1.4.12 to v1.5.0 is compatible and brings improvements.

Verification successful

Verified compatibility of github.com/cosmos/gogoproto update.

The update from v1.4.12 to v1.5.0 introduces improvements and support for google.golang.org/protobuf types without any breaking changes. The update is compatible and beneficial for the codebase.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the compatibility of `github.com/cosmos/gogoproto` update.

# Test: Check for the usage of `github.com/cosmos/gogoproto`. Expect: Compatibility and improvements.
rg --type go -A 5 'github.com/cosmos/gogoproto'

Length of output: 7662


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch the changelog or release notes for github.com/cosmos/gogoproto to verify changes between versions v1.4.12 and v1.5.0

# Clone the repository to access the changelog or release notes
git clone https://github.com/cosmos/gogoproto.git

# Navigate into the repository directory
cd gogoproto

# List the changelog or release notes files to identify changes
if [ -f "CHANGELOG.md" ]; then
  echo "Changelog found:"
  cat CHANGELOG.md
elif [ -f "RELEASE_NOTES.md" ]; then
  echo "Release notes found:"
  cat RELEASE_NOTES.md
else
  echo "No changelog or release notes found."
fi

Length of output: 5941

app/app.go (15)

49-49: Verify the necessity of new imports and the removal of old ones.

Ensure that the newly added imports are required and the removed imports are no longer needed to avoid potential issues.


59-59: Verify the necessity of new imports.

Ensure that the newly added imports for cryptocodec, ibctestingtypes, and icaauthkeeper are required for the new functionalities or refactored components.


72-72: Verify the necessity of new import.

Ensure that the newly added import for keepers is required for the new AppKeepers struct.


75-76: Verify the necessity of new imports.

Ensure that the newly added imports for kvindexermodule and kvindexerkeeper are required for the new indexer functionalities.


94-94: Improved error handling.

The error handling for os.UserHomeDir has been updated to use tmos.Exit, which is a better practice than using a panic.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 94-94: app/app.go#L94
Added line #L94 was not covered by tests


105-108: Enhanced modularity and maintainability.

The MinitiaApp struct now includes AppKeepers and address codecs, improving modularity and maintainability.


125-128: Verify the necessity of new fields.

Ensure that the newly added fields kvIndexerKeeper and kvIndexerModule are required for the new indexer functionalities.


Line range hint 143-172:
Enhanced initialization process.

The NewMinitiaApp constructor has been updated to include new parameters and configurations, enhancing the initialization process.


182-185: Proper initialization of address codecs.

The NewMinitiaApp constructor now initializes the address codecs, ensuring they are properly set up.


204-217: Improved keeper management.

The NewMinitiaApp constructor now uses keepers.NewAppKeeper to set up the keepers, encapsulating the keeper creation and management within a single function.


253-262: Enhanced indexing capabilities.

The NewMinitiaApp constructor now includes the setup for the indexer, enhancing the application's indexing capabilities.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 255-255: app/app.go#L255
Added line #L255 was not covered by tests


[warning] 257-262: app/app.go#L257-L262
Added lines #L257 - L262 were not covered by tests


267-271: Improved upgrade management.

The NewMinitiaApp constructor now registers executor change plans, improving the application's upgrade management.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 270-271: app/app.go#L270-L271
Added lines #L270 - L271 were not covered by tests


277-277: Enhanced introspection capabilities.

The NewMinitiaApp constructor now registers the reflection service, enhancing the application's introspection capabilities.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 277-277: app/app.go#L277
Added line #L277 was not covered by tests


393-398: Improved indexing capabilities.

The SetKVIndexer method has been added to the MinitiaApp struct, allowing the setting of the KV indexer keeper and module.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 394-397: app/app.go#L394-L397
Added lines #L394 - L397 were not covered by tests


446-454: Improved account management capabilities.

The BlockedModuleAccountAddrs method has been added to the MinitiaApp struct, allowing the retrieval of blocked module account addresses.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 453-454: app/app.go#L453-L454
Added lines #L453 - L454 were not covered by tests

app/keepers/keepers.go (12)

1-15: Verify the necessity of imported packages.

Ensure that the imported packages are required for the functionalities in this file.


34-58: Verify the necessity of IBC-related imports.

Ensure that the imported packages related to IBC are required for the functionalities in this file.


61-68: Verify the necessity of Initia-related imports.

Ensure that the imported packages related to Initia are required for the functionalities in this file.


69-74: Verify the necessity of OPinit-related imports.

Ensure that the imported packages related to OPinit are required for the functionalities in this file.


77-83: Verify the necessity of Skip-related imports.

Ensure that the imported packages related to Skip are required for the functionalities in this file.


85-88: Verify the necessity of CosmWasm-related imports.

Ensure that the imported packages related to CosmWasm are required for the functionalities in this file.


91-96: Verify the necessity of local imports.

Ensure that the imported packages related to local functionalities are required for the functionalities in this file.


98-100: Verify the necessity of Noble Forwarding-related imports.

Ensure that the imported packages related to Noble Forwarding are required for the functionalities in this file.


104-146: Enhanced modularity and maintainability.

The AppKeepers struct has been added, encapsulating various keepers and improving the modularity and maintainability of the application.


148-172: Improved keeper initialization.

The NewAppKeeper function has been added to initialize the AppKeepers struct, encapsulating the initialization of the keepers within a single function.


174-184: Proper setup of BaseApp's parameter store.

The NewAppKeeper function now sets the BaseApp's parameter store, ensuring it is properly set up during the application initialization.


185-195: Proper setup of capability keeper and IBC module scopes.

The NewAppKeeper function now adds the capability keeper and scopes for IBC modules, ensuring they are properly set up during the application initialization.

app/blocksdk.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/blocksdk.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
app/indexer.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/indexer.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/indexer.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/indexer.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/indexer.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/indexer.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/indexer.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/indexer.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 16

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d094f14 and 3e24e10.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • app/app.go (20 hunks)
  • app/indexer.go (1 hunks)
  • app/keepers/keys.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • app/keepers/keys.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
app/indexer.go

[warning] 28-29: app/indexer.go#L28-L29
Added lines #L28 - L29 were not covered by tests


[warning] 41-42: app/indexer.go#L41-L42
Added lines #L41 - L42 were not covered by tests


[warning] 45-46: app/indexer.go#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests


[warning] 49-50: app/indexer.go#L49-L50
Added lines #L49 - L50 were not covered by tests


[warning] 53-54: app/indexer.go#L53-L54
Added lines #L53 - L54 were not covered by tests


[warning] 57-58: app/indexer.go#L57-L58
Added lines #L57 - L58 were not covered by tests


[warning] 64-64: app/indexer.go#L64
Added line #L64 was not covered by tests


[warning] 69-71: app/indexer.go#L69-L71
Added lines #L69 - L71 were not covered by tests


[warning] 73-75: app/indexer.go#L73-L75
Added lines #L73 - L75 were not covered by tests


[warning] 77-79: app/indexer.go#L77-L79
Added lines #L77 - L79 were not covered by tests


[warning] 81-83: app/indexer.go#L81-L83
Added lines #L81 - L83 were not covered by tests

app/app.go

[warning] 94-94: app/app.go#L94
Added line #L94 was not covered by tests


[warning] 172-172: app/app.go#L172
Added line #L172 was not covered by tests


[warning] 250-250: app/app.go#L250
Added line #L250 was not covered by tests


[warning] 255-255: app/app.go#L255
Added line #L255 was not covered by tests


[warning] 257-262: app/app.go#L257-L262
Added lines #L257 - L262 were not covered by tests


[warning] 270-271: app/app.go#L270-L271
Added lines #L270 - L271 were not covered by tests


[warning] 277-277: app/app.go#L277
Added line #L277 was not covered by tests


[warning] 296-296: app/app.go#L296
Added line #L296 was not covered by tests


[warning] 316-316: app/app.go#L316
Added line #L316 was not covered by tests


[warning] 386-386: app/app.go#L386
Added line #L386 was not covered by tests


[warning] 393-396: app/app.go#L393-L396
Added lines #L393 - L396 were not covered by tests


[warning] 421-421: app/app.go#L421
Added line #L421 was not covered by tests


[warning] 424-424: app/app.go#L424
Added line #L424 was not covered by tests


[warning] 452-453: app/app.go#L452-L453
Added lines #L452 - L453 were not covered by tests


[warning] 498-500: app/app.go#L498-L500
Added lines #L498 - L500 were not covered by tests


[warning] 540-540: app/app.go#L540
Added line #L540 was not covered by tests


[warning] 603-604: app/app.go#L603-L604
Added lines #L603 - L604 were not covered by tests

Additional comments not posted (11)
app/indexer.go (11)

26-29: Add test coverage for error handling.

The error handling for kvindexerconfig.NewConfig is not covered by tests.

Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this error handling?

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 28-29: app/indexer.go#L28-L29
Added lines #L28 - L29 were not covered by tests


39-42: Add test coverage for error handling.

The error handling for blocksubmodule.NewBlockSubmodule is not covered by tests.

Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this error handling?

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 41-42: app/indexer.go#L41-L42
Added lines #L41 - L42 were not covered by tests


43-46: Add test coverage for error handling.

The error handling for tx.NewTxSubmodule is not covered by tests.

Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this error handling?

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 45-46: app/indexer.go#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests


47-50: Add test coverage for error handling.

The error handling for pair.NewPairSubmodule is not covered by tests.

Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this error handling?

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 49-50: app/indexer.go#L49-L50
Added lines #L49 - L50 were not covered by tests


51-54: Add test coverage for error handling.

The error handling for nft.NewWasmNFTSubmodule is not covered by tests.

Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this error handling?

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 53-54: app/indexer.go#L53-L54
Added lines #L53 - L54 were not covered by tests


55-58: Add test coverage for error handling.

The error handling for kvIndexerKeeper.RegisterSubmodules is not covered by tests.

Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this error handling?

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 57-58: app/indexer.go#L57-L58
Added lines #L57 - L58 were not covered by tests


69-71: Add test coverage for validation.

The validation of kvIndexer.Validate is not covered by tests.

Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this validation?

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 69-71: app/indexer.go#L69-L71
Added lines #L69 - L71 were not covered by tests


73-75: Add test coverage for preparation.

The preparation step kvIndexer.Prepare is not covered by tests.

Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this preparation step?

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 73-75: app/indexer.go#L73-L75
Added lines #L73 - L75 were not covered by tests


77-79: Add test coverage for sealing.

The sealing step kvIndexerKeeper.Seal is not covered by tests.

Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this sealing step?

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 77-79: app/indexer.go#L77-L79
Added lines #L77 - L79 were not covered by tests


81-83: Add test coverage for starting the indexer.

The starting step kvIndexer.Start is not covered by tests.

Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this starting step?

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 81-83: app/indexer.go#L81-L83
Added lines #L81 - L83 were not covered by tests


85-91: Add test coverage for module and streaming manager initialization.

The initialization of kvindexermodule.NewAppModuleBasic and storetypes.StreamingManager is not covered by tests.

Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this initialization?

app/app.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/app.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/app.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/app.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/app.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/app.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/app.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/app.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/app.go Show resolved Hide resolved
app/app.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@beer-1 beer-1 force-pushed the feat/app-struct-refactor branch from 93de477 to b2922ab Compare August 7, 2024 07:27
Copy link
Contributor

@Vritra4 Vritra4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@beer-1 beer-1 merged commit 5f6b424 into main Aug 14, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
@beer-1 beer-1 deleted the feat/app-struct-refactor branch August 14, 2024 09:11
hallazzang added a commit to milkyway-labs/milkyway that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
This was referenced Nov 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants