-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: refactor app struct #60
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the architecture and functionality of the blockchain application through significant restructuring, improved error handling, and the introduction of modular features. Key updates include refined keeper management, a robust indexing mechanism, and dependency upgrades to leverage the latest enhancements. This strategic overhaul aims to bolster maintainability, performance, and operational resilience within the Cosmos SDK ecosystem, ultimately improving the application's efficiency and clarity. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant App as MinitiaApp
participant Keeper as AppKeepers
participant Indexer as Indexer
App->>Keeper: Initialize application keepers
Keeper->>App: Setup necessary keepers
App->>Indexer: Initialize indexing mechanism
Indexer->>App: Register indexing components
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #60 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 64.26% 64.40% +0.13%
==========================================
Files 35 40 +5
Lines 3098 3222 +124
==========================================
+ Hits 1991 2075 +84
- Misses 937 972 +35
- Partials 170 175 +5
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 13
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
app/keepers/keys.go (1)
55-67
: Verify key initialization.The following keys are missing in
app/keepers/keys.go
and should be included to ensure all necessary modules are covered:
distributiontypes.StoreKey
govtypes.StoreKey
stakingtypes.StoreKey
Please add these keys to the
GenerateKeys
function.Analysis chain
Verify key initialization.
Ensure that all necessary keys for the modules are included and correctly initialized.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization of keys for various modules. # Test: Search for the keys initialization. Expect: All necessary keys are included. rg --type go -A 5 $'NewKVStoreKeys'Length of output: 2048
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all keys used in the repository to verify against the keys initialized in app/keepers/keys.go # Find all instances of StoreKey definitions rg --type go 'StoreKey' -A 0Length of output: 7809
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and list all unique StoreKey definitions used in the repository to verify against the keys initialized in app/keepers/keys.go # Extract all unique StoreKey definitions rg --type go 'StoreKey' -A 0 | grep -oP '\w+types.StoreKey' | sort | uniqLength of output: 629
app/modules.go (2)
140-159
: Includedistr
module in orderBeginBlockers.The
distr
module is mentioned in the comments as necessary for the correct order of BeginBlockers but is not included in theorderBeginBlockers
function. Please includedistr
in theorderBeginBlockers
function to align with the documented requirements.
app/modules.go
: Includedistr
module in theorderBeginBlockers
function.Analysis chain
Verify order of BeginBlockers.
Ensure that the order of BeginBlockers is correctly defined.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the order of BeginBlockers. # Test: Check for the order of BeginBlockers. Expect: Correct order of BeginBlockers. rg --type go -A 5 'orderBeginBlockers'Length of output: 1089
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of distr module and other relevant modules in BeginBlockers. # Search for the 'distr' module in the codebase rg --type go 'distr' # Search for other relevant modules mentioned in comments or documentation rg --type go 'BeginBlocker'Length of output: 1146
161-179
: Missingstaking
andprovider
modules inorderEndBlockers
functionThe
staking
andprovider
modules are not included in theorderEndBlockers
function, which contradicts the specified requirements in the comments. Ensure thatstaking.EndBlock
is executed beforeprovider.EndBlock
, andgov.EndBlock
is executed beforestaking.EndBlock
.
app/modules.go
: Addstaking
andprovider
modules to theorderEndBlockers
function in the correct order.Analysis chain
Verify order of EndBlockers.
Ensure that the order of EndBlockers is correctly defined.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the order of EndBlockers. # Test: Check for the order of EndBlockers. Expect: Correct order of EndBlockers. rg --type go -A 5 'orderEndBlockers'Length of output: 618
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence and order of staking and provider modules in the orderEndBlockers function. # Search for the definition of the orderEndBlockers function and include more lines to capture the entire list. rg --type go -A 20 'func orderEndBlockers() []string' # Search for the usage of staking and provider modules in the codebase to ensure they are included and ordered correctly. rg --type go 'staking' 'provider'Length of output: 255
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence and order of staking and provider modules in the orderEndBlockers function. # Search for the definition of the orderEndBlockers function and include more lines to capture the entire list. rg --type go -A 20 'func orderEndBlockers\(\) \[\]string' # Search for the usage of staking and provider modules in the codebase to ensure they are included and ordered correctly. rg --type go 'staking' rg --type go 'provider'Length of output: 2810
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (10)
- .github/workflows/build-linux-arm64.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks)
- app/app.go (19 hunks)
- app/app_test.go (1 hunks)
- app/blocksdk.go (1 hunks)
- app/indexer.go (1 hunks)
- app/keepers/keepers.go (1 hunks)
- app/keepers/keys.go (1 hunks)
- app/modules.go (1 hunks)
- go.mod (11 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/workflows/build-linux-arm64.yml
- .github/workflows/lint.yml
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
app/indexer.go
[warning] 28-29: app/indexer.go#L28-L29
Added lines #L28 - L29 were not covered by tests
[warning] 41-42: app/indexer.go#L41-L42
Added lines #L41 - L42 were not covered by tests
[warning] 45-46: app/indexer.go#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests
[warning] 49-50: app/indexer.go#L49-L50
Added lines #L49 - L50 were not covered by tests
[warning] 53-54: app/indexer.go#L53-L54
Added lines #L53 - L54 were not covered by tests
[warning] 57-58: app/indexer.go#L57-L58
Added lines #L57 - L58 were not covered by tests
[warning] 67-69: app/indexer.go#L67-L69
Added lines #L67 - L69 were not covered by tests
[warning] 71-73: app/indexer.go#L71-L73
Added lines #L71 - L73 were not covered by tests
[warning] 75-77: app/indexer.go#L75-L77
Added lines #L75 - L77 were not covered by tests
[warning] 79-81: app/indexer.go#L79-L81
Added lines #L79 - L81 were not covered by tests
[warning] 83-89: app/indexer.go#L83-L89
Added lines #L83 - L89 were not covered by testsapp/blocksdk.go
[warning] 86-87: app/blocksdk.go#L86-L87
Added lines #L86 - L87 were not covered by tests
[warning] 110-111: app/blocksdk.go#L110-L111
Added lines #L110 - L111 were not covered by testsapp/app.go
[warning] 94-94: app/app.go#L94
Added line #L94 was not covered by tests
[warning] 172-172: app/app.go#L172
Added line #L172 was not covered by tests
[warning] 250-250: app/app.go#L250
Added line #L250 was not covered by tests
[warning] 255-255: app/app.go#L255
Added line #L255 was not covered by tests
[warning] 257-262: app/app.go#L257-L262
Added lines #L257 - L262 were not covered by tests
[warning] 270-271: app/app.go#L270-L271
Added lines #L270 - L271 were not covered by tests
[warning] 277-277: app/app.go#L277
Added line #L277 was not covered by tests
[warning] 297-297: app/app.go#L297
Added line #L297 was not covered by tests
[warning] 317-317: app/app.go#L317
Added line #L317 was not covered by tests
[warning] 387-387: app/app.go#L387
Added line #L387 was not covered by tests
[warning] 394-397: app/app.go#L394-L397
Added lines #L394 - L397 were not covered by tests
[warning] 422-422: app/app.go#L422
Added line #L422 was not covered by tests
[warning] 425-425: app/app.go#L425
Added line #L425 was not covered by tests
[warning] 453-454: app/app.go#L453-L454
Added lines #L453 - L454 were not covered by tests
[warning] 499-501: app/app.go#L499-L501
Added lines #L499 - L501 were not covered by tests
[warning] 541-541: app/app.go#L541
Added line #L541 was not covered by tests
[warning] 604-605: app/app.go#L604-L605
Added lines #L604 - L605 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (52)
app/keepers/keys.go (6)
76-78
: LGTM!The function correctly returns the KV store keys.
80-82
: LGTM!The function correctly returns the transient store keys.
84-86
: LGTM!The function correctly returns the memory store keys.
91-93
: LGTM!The function correctly returns the KV store key for the provided store key.
98-100
: LGTM!The function correctly returns the transient store key for the provided store key.
105-107
: LGTM!The function correctly returns the memory store key for the provided store key.
app/app_test.go (5)
Line range hint
55-57
:
LGTM!The function correctly tests the module account permissions.
Line range hint
59-94
:
LGTM!The function correctly tests the initialization of genesis on migration.
Line range hint
96-110
:
LGTM!The function correctly tests the upgrade state on genesis.
Line range hint
112-117
:
LGTM!The function correctly tests the retrieval of keys.
Line range hint
44-52
:
Verify the new logic for retrieving blocked module account addresses.The logic for retrieving blocked module account addresses has been modified to enhance accuracy. Verify the correctness of this new logic.
Verification successful
Verification successful for retrieving blocked module account addresses.
The new logic in
app/app_test.go
correctly processes the blocked module account addresses by converting them from Bech32 format or retrieving them from the account keeper if conversion fails.
- The
BlockedModuleAccountAddrs
function inapp/app.go
removes allowed module accounts from the provided map and returns the blocked addresses.- The test logic in
app/app_test.go
iterates over these addresses and handles them appropriately.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new logic for retrieving blocked module account addresses. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct logic for retrieving blocked module account addresses. rg --type go -A 5 $'BlockedModuleAccountAddrs'Length of output: 1154
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full implementation of the BlockedModuleAccountAddrs function. # Extract the implementation of BlockedModuleAccountAddrs from app/app.go ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (app *MinitiaApp) BlockedModuleAccountAddrs($_) $_' --after 20Length of output: 1604
app/blocksdk.go (4)
55-63
: Verify lane initialization parameters.Ensure that the parameters for initializing
mevLane
are correctly configured, especiallyMaxBlockSpace
andMaxTxs
.Verification successful
Parameters for
mevLane
initialization are correctly configured.The values
MaxBlockSpace
set tomath.LegacyMustNewDecFromStr("0.09")
andMaxTxs
set to100
are valid configurations based on the codebase.
MaxBlockSpace
:0.09
is one of the valid values.MaxTxs
:100
is one of the valid values.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the parameters used for initializing mevLane. # Test: Check for the initialization of mevLane. Expect: Correct parameters for MaxBlockSpace and MaxTxs. rg --type go -A 5 'mevlane.NewMEVLane'Length of output: 391
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to MaxBlockSpace in the codebase to verify its expected value. rg --type go 'MaxBlockSpace' # Search for references to MaxTxs in the codebase to verify its expected value. rg --type go 'MaxTxs'Length of output: 992
65-72
: Verify lane initialization parameters.Ensure that the parameters for initializing
freeLane
are correctly configured, especiallyMaxBlockSpace
andMaxTxs
.
74-81
: Verify lane initialization parameters.Ensure that the parameters for initializing
defaultLane
are correctly configured, especiallyMaxBlockSpace
andMaxTxs
.
46-53
: Verify lane initialization parameters.Ensure that the parameters for initializing
systemLane
are correctly configured, especiallyMaxBlockSpace
andMaxTxs
.Verification successful
Verification of lane initialization parameters
The parameters for initializing
systemLane
withMaxBlockSpace
set tomath.LegacyMustNewDecFromStr("0.01")
andMaxTxs
set to1
appear to be correctly configured based on the context provided and the external packageblockbase
.
- MaxBlockSpace:
math.LegacyMustNewDecFromStr("0.01")
- MaxTxs:
1
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the parameters used for initializing systemLane. # Test: Check for the initialization of systemLane. Expect: Correct parameters for MaxBlockSpace and MaxTxs. rg --type go -A 5 'initialanes.NewSystemLane'Length of output: 406
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definitions and expected values for MaxBlockSpace and MaxTxs in blockbase.LaneConfig # Search for the definition of LaneConfig in the blockbase package rg --type go 'type LaneConfig struct' -A 10 # Search for references to MaxBlockSpace and MaxTxs in the codebase to understand their expected values rg --type go 'MaxBlockSpace' rg --type go 'MaxTxs'Length of output: 1038
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of LaneConfig in the entire codebase # Search for the term LaneConfig across the entire codebase to find its definition and context rg --type go 'LaneConfig'Length of output: 329
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the term blockbase to locate the package or file that defines LaneConfig # Search for the term blockbase across the entire codebase rg --type go 'blockbase'Length of output: 695
app/modules.go (4)
72-89
: Verify module account permissions.Ensure that the permissions for each module account are correctly configured.
126-138
: Verify basic manager setup.Ensure that the basic manager is correctly set up with the necessary modules and interfaces.
Verification successful
Verify the correct setup and usage of the Basic Manager.
Ensure that the
BasicModuleManager
is correctly set up with the necessary modules and interfaces and is used appropriately throughout the application.
Verified: Basic Manager setup and usage.
The
BasicModuleManager
is correctly set up with the necessary modules and interfaces and is used appropriately throughout the application.
- The
newBasicManagerFromManager
function initializes theBasicModuleManager
with the necessary modules and interfaces.- The
BasicModuleManager
is used in key parts of the application, including setting up module operations and GRPC Gateway routes.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the setup of the basic manager. # Test: Check for the setup of the basic manager. Expect: Correct setup of the basic manager with necessary modules and interfaces. rg --type go -A 5 'newBasicManagerFromManager'Length of output: 667
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the setup and usage of the Basic Manager. # Test: Check for the setup of the Basic Manager in app/app.go. Expect: Proper configuration and usage of BasicModuleManager. rg --type go 'BasicModuleManager' -A 5 # Test: Check for the usage of the newBasicManagerFromManager function. Expect: Proper usage throughout the application. rg --type go 'newBasicManagerFromManager' -A 10Length of output: 2825
91-123
: Verify app modules inclusion and initialization.Ensure that all necessary app modules are included and correctly initialized.
Verification successful
All necessary app modules are correctly included and initialized.
The
appModules
function inapp/modules.go
correctly includes and initializes all necessary app modules.
- The modules are properly defined and initialized within the function.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the inclusion and initialization of app modules. # Test: Check for the inclusion and initialization of app modules. Expect: Correct inclusion and initialization of all necessary app modules. rg --type go -A 5 'appModules'Length of output: 786
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definitions and initializations of each module within the appModules function. # List of modules to verify modules=( "auth.NewAppModule" "bank.NewAppModule" "opchild.NewAppModule" "capability.NewAppModule" "crisis.NewAppModule" "feegrantmodule.NewAppModule" "upgrade.NewAppModule" "authzmodule.NewAppModule" "groupmodule.NewAppModule" "consensus.NewAppModule" "wasm.NewAppModule" "auction.NewAppModule" "tokenfactory.NewAppModule" "ibc.NewAppModule" "ibctransfer.NewAppModule" "ica.NewAppModule" "icaauth.NewAppModule" "ibcfee.NewAppModule" "ibctm.NewAppModule" "solomachine.NewAppModule" "packetforward.NewAppModule" "ibchooks.NewAppModule" "forwarding.NewAppModule" "oracle.NewAppModule" "marketmap.NewAppModule" ) # Verify each module definition and initialization for module in "${modules[@]}"; do echo "Verifying $module..." rg --type go -A 5 "$module" doneLength of output: 17033
182-200
: Verify order of InitBlockers.Ensure that the order of InitBlockers is correctly defined.
Verification successful
Verified order of InitBlockers.
The order of InitBlockers in the
orderInitBlockers
function is correctly defined according to the comments in the code.
capabilitytypes.ModuleName
is first.genutiltypes.ModuleName
is placed afterauthtypes.ModuleName
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the order of InitBlockers. # Test: Check for the order of InitBlockers. Expect: Correct order of InitBlockers. rg --type go -A 5 'orderInitBlockers'Length of output: 860
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the order of InitBlockers from the function definition rg --type go -A 20 'func orderInitBlockers() \[\]string {' app/modules.go | grep -oP '\w+types\.ModuleName' | tr '\n' ' 'Length of output: 261
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the order of InitBlockers from the function definition with corrected regex rg --type go -A 20 'func orderInitBlockers\(\) \[\]string {' app/modules.go | grep -oP '\w+types\.ModuleName' | tr '\n' ' 'Length of output: 267
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract lines containing ModuleName from the orderInitBlockers function definition rg --type go -A 20 'func orderInitBlockers' app/modules.go | grep 'ModuleName'Length of output: 690
go.mod (6)
3-3
: LGTM! Go version update.The Go version has been updated from
1.22
to1.22.0
.
23-23
: Verify compatibility ofgithub.com/cometbft/cometbft
update.Ensure that the update from
v0.38.7
tov0.38.10
is compatible and brings improvements.
26-26
: Verify compatibility ofgithub.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk
update.Ensure that the update from
v0.50.7
tov0.50.8
is compatible and brings improvements.
19-19
: Verify compatibility ofcosmossdk.io/x/upgrade
update.Ensure that the update from
v0.1.1
tov0.1.3
is compatible and brings improvements.
50-50
: Verify compatibility ofgithub.com/skip-mev/slinky
update.Ensure that the update from
v0.4.3
tov1.0.5
is compatible and brings improvements.
28-28
: Verify compatibility ofgithub.com/cosmos/gogoproto
update.Ensure that the update from
v1.4.12
tov1.5.0
is compatible and brings improvements.Verification successful
Verified compatibility of
github.com/cosmos/gogoproto
update.The update from
v1.4.12
tov1.5.0
introduces improvements and support forgoogle.golang.org/protobuf
types without any breaking changes. The update is compatible and beneficial for the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the compatibility of `github.com/cosmos/gogoproto` update. # Test: Check for the usage of `github.com/cosmos/gogoproto`. Expect: Compatibility and improvements. rg --type go -A 5 'github.com/cosmos/gogoproto'Length of output: 7662
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Fetch the changelog or release notes for github.com/cosmos/gogoproto to verify changes between versions v1.4.12 and v1.5.0 # Clone the repository to access the changelog or release notes git clone https://github.com/cosmos/gogoproto.git # Navigate into the repository directory cd gogoproto # List the changelog or release notes files to identify changes if [ -f "CHANGELOG.md" ]; then echo "Changelog found:" cat CHANGELOG.md elif [ -f "RELEASE_NOTES.md" ]; then echo "Release notes found:" cat RELEASE_NOTES.md else echo "No changelog or release notes found." fiLength of output: 5941
app/app.go (15)
49-49
: Verify the necessity of new imports and the removal of old ones.Ensure that the newly added imports are required and the removed imports are no longer needed to avoid potential issues.
59-59
: Verify the necessity of new imports.Ensure that the newly added imports for
cryptocodec
,ibctestingtypes
, andicaauthkeeper
are required for the new functionalities or refactored components.
72-72
: Verify the necessity of new import.Ensure that the newly added import for
keepers
is required for the newAppKeepers
struct.
75-76
: Verify the necessity of new imports.Ensure that the newly added imports for
kvindexermodule
andkvindexerkeeper
are required for the new indexer functionalities.
94-94
: Improved error handling.The error handling for
os.UserHomeDir
has been updated to usetmos.Exit
, which is a better practice than using a panic.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 94-94: app/app.go#L94
Added line #L94 was not covered by tests
105-108
: Enhanced modularity and maintainability.The
MinitiaApp
struct now includesAppKeepers
and address codecs, improving modularity and maintainability.
125-128
: Verify the necessity of new fields.Ensure that the newly added fields
kvIndexerKeeper
andkvIndexerModule
are required for the new indexer functionalities.
Line range hint
143-172
:
Enhanced initialization process.The
NewMinitiaApp
constructor has been updated to include new parameters and configurations, enhancing the initialization process.
182-185
: Proper initialization of address codecs.The
NewMinitiaApp
constructor now initializes the address codecs, ensuring they are properly set up.
204-217
: Improved keeper management.The
NewMinitiaApp
constructor now useskeepers.NewAppKeeper
to set up the keepers, encapsulating the keeper creation and management within a single function.
253-262
: Enhanced indexing capabilities.The
NewMinitiaApp
constructor now includes the setup for the indexer, enhancing the application's indexing capabilities.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 255-255: app/app.go#L255
Added line #L255 was not covered by tests
[warning] 257-262: app/app.go#L257-L262
Added lines #L257 - L262 were not covered by tests
267-271
: Improved upgrade management.The
NewMinitiaApp
constructor now registers executor change plans, improving the application's upgrade management.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 270-271: app/app.go#L270-L271
Added lines #L270 - L271 were not covered by tests
277-277
: Enhanced introspection capabilities.The
NewMinitiaApp
constructor now registers the reflection service, enhancing the application's introspection capabilities.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 277-277: app/app.go#L277
Added line #L277 was not covered by tests
393-398
: Improved indexing capabilities.The
SetKVIndexer
method has been added to theMinitiaApp
struct, allowing the setting of the KV indexer keeper and module.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 394-397: app/app.go#L394-L397
Added lines #L394 - L397 were not covered by tests
446-454
: Improved account management capabilities.The
BlockedModuleAccountAddrs
method has been added to theMinitiaApp
struct, allowing the retrieval of blocked module account addresses.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 453-454: app/app.go#L453-L454
Added lines #L453 - L454 were not covered by testsapp/keepers/keepers.go (12)
1-15
: Verify the necessity of imported packages.Ensure that the imported packages are required for the functionalities in this file.
34-58
: Verify the necessity of IBC-related imports.Ensure that the imported packages related to IBC are required for the functionalities in this file.
61-68
: Verify the necessity of Initia-related imports.Ensure that the imported packages related to Initia are required for the functionalities in this file.
69-74
: Verify the necessity of OPinit-related imports.Ensure that the imported packages related to OPinit are required for the functionalities in this file.
77-83
: Verify the necessity of Skip-related imports.Ensure that the imported packages related to Skip are required for the functionalities in this file.
85-88
: Verify the necessity of CosmWasm-related imports.Ensure that the imported packages related to CosmWasm are required for the functionalities in this file.
91-96
: Verify the necessity of local imports.Ensure that the imported packages related to local functionalities are required for the functionalities in this file.
98-100
: Verify the necessity of Noble Forwarding-related imports.Ensure that the imported packages related to Noble Forwarding are required for the functionalities in this file.
104-146
: Enhanced modularity and maintainability.The
AppKeepers
struct has been added, encapsulating various keepers and improving the modularity and maintainability of the application.
148-172
: Improved keeper initialization.The
NewAppKeeper
function has been added to initialize theAppKeepers
struct, encapsulating the initialization of the keepers within a single function.
174-184
: Proper setup of BaseApp's parameter store.The
NewAppKeeper
function now sets the BaseApp's parameter store, ensuring it is properly set up during the application initialization.
185-195
: Proper setup of capability keeper and IBC module scopes.The
NewAppKeeper
function now adds the capability keeper and scopes for IBC modules, ensuring they are properly set up during the application initialization.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 16
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- app/app.go (20 hunks)
- app/indexer.go (1 hunks)
- app/keepers/keys.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/keepers/keys.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
app/indexer.go
[warning] 28-29: app/indexer.go#L28-L29
Added lines #L28 - L29 were not covered by tests
[warning] 41-42: app/indexer.go#L41-L42
Added lines #L41 - L42 were not covered by tests
[warning] 45-46: app/indexer.go#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests
[warning] 49-50: app/indexer.go#L49-L50
Added lines #L49 - L50 were not covered by tests
[warning] 53-54: app/indexer.go#L53-L54
Added lines #L53 - L54 were not covered by tests
[warning] 57-58: app/indexer.go#L57-L58
Added lines #L57 - L58 were not covered by tests
[warning] 64-64: app/indexer.go#L64
Added line #L64 was not covered by tests
[warning] 69-71: app/indexer.go#L69-L71
Added lines #L69 - L71 were not covered by tests
[warning] 73-75: app/indexer.go#L73-L75
Added lines #L73 - L75 were not covered by tests
[warning] 77-79: app/indexer.go#L77-L79
Added lines #L77 - L79 were not covered by tests
[warning] 81-83: app/indexer.go#L81-L83
Added lines #L81 - L83 were not covered by testsapp/app.go
[warning] 94-94: app/app.go#L94
Added line #L94 was not covered by tests
[warning] 172-172: app/app.go#L172
Added line #L172 was not covered by tests
[warning] 250-250: app/app.go#L250
Added line #L250 was not covered by tests
[warning] 255-255: app/app.go#L255
Added line #L255 was not covered by tests
[warning] 257-262: app/app.go#L257-L262
Added lines #L257 - L262 were not covered by tests
[warning] 270-271: app/app.go#L270-L271
Added lines #L270 - L271 were not covered by tests
[warning] 277-277: app/app.go#L277
Added line #L277 was not covered by tests
[warning] 296-296: app/app.go#L296
Added line #L296 was not covered by tests
[warning] 316-316: app/app.go#L316
Added line #L316 was not covered by tests
[warning] 386-386: app/app.go#L386
Added line #L386 was not covered by tests
[warning] 393-396: app/app.go#L393-L396
Added lines #L393 - L396 were not covered by tests
[warning] 421-421: app/app.go#L421
Added line #L421 was not covered by tests
[warning] 424-424: app/app.go#L424
Added line #L424 was not covered by tests
[warning] 452-453: app/app.go#L452-L453
Added lines #L452 - L453 were not covered by tests
[warning] 498-500: app/app.go#L498-L500
Added lines #L498 - L500 were not covered by tests
[warning] 540-540: app/app.go#L540
Added line #L540 was not covered by tests
[warning] 603-604: app/app.go#L603-L604
Added lines #L603 - L604 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (11)
app/indexer.go (11)
26-29
: Add test coverage for error handling.The error handling for
kvindexerconfig.NewConfig
is not covered by tests.Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this error handling?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 28-29: app/indexer.go#L28-L29
Added lines #L28 - L29 were not covered by tests
39-42
: Add test coverage for error handling.The error handling for
blocksubmodule.NewBlockSubmodule
is not covered by tests.Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this error handling?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 41-42: app/indexer.go#L41-L42
Added lines #L41 - L42 were not covered by tests
43-46
: Add test coverage for error handling.The error handling for
tx.NewTxSubmodule
is not covered by tests.Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this error handling?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 45-46: app/indexer.go#L45-L46
Added lines #L45 - L46 were not covered by tests
47-50
: Add test coverage for error handling.The error handling for
pair.NewPairSubmodule
is not covered by tests.Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this error handling?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 49-50: app/indexer.go#L49-L50
Added lines #L49 - L50 were not covered by tests
51-54
: Add test coverage for error handling.The error handling for
nft.NewWasmNFTSubmodule
is not covered by tests.Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this error handling?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 53-54: app/indexer.go#L53-L54
Added lines #L53 - L54 were not covered by tests
55-58
: Add test coverage for error handling.The error handling for
kvIndexerKeeper.RegisterSubmodules
is not covered by tests.Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this error handling?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 57-58: app/indexer.go#L57-L58
Added lines #L57 - L58 were not covered by tests
69-71
: Add test coverage for validation.The validation of
kvIndexer.Validate
is not covered by tests.Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this validation?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 69-71: app/indexer.go#L69-L71
Added lines #L69 - L71 were not covered by tests
73-75
: Add test coverage for preparation.The preparation step
kvIndexer.Prepare
is not covered by tests.Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this preparation step?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 73-75: app/indexer.go#L73-L75
Added lines #L73 - L75 were not covered by tests
77-79
: Add test coverage for sealing.The sealing step
kvIndexerKeeper.Seal
is not covered by tests.Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this sealing step?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 77-79: app/indexer.go#L77-L79
Added lines #L77 - L79 were not covered by tests
81-83
: Add test coverage for starting the indexer.The starting step
kvIndexer.Start
is not covered by tests.Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this starting step?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 81-83: app/indexer.go#L81-L83
Added lines #L81 - L83 were not covered by tests
85-91
: Add test coverage for module and streaming manager initialization.The initialization of
kvindexermodule.NewAppModuleBasic
andstoretypes.StreamingManager
is not covered by tests.Do you want me to assist in generating the test cases for this initialization?
93de477
to
b2922ab
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Description
need to wait until initia-labs/cometbft#5 merged.
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit