Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chores: clear deps and setup #90

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2025
Merged

chores: clear deps and setup #90

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

beer-1
Copy link
Member

@beer-1 beer-1 commented Jan 14, 2025

Description

Use latest custom deps


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Configuration

    • Disabled inter-block caching feature
  • Dependencies

    • Updated multiple package dependencies
    • Upgraded CometBFT and token factory client versions
    • Replaced some dependencies to address vulnerabilities
  • Protobuf

    • Improved formatting of token factory protocol buffer definitions
    • Standardized import and field option styles

@beer-1 beer-1 self-assigned this Jan 14, 2025
@beer-1 beer-1 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 14, 2025 04:13
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several configuration and dependency updates across multiple files. In the cmd/minitiad/config.go, a new configuration option is added to disable inter-block caching. The go.mod file undergoes significant dependency management changes, updating and replacing various package versions. The proto/miniwasm/tokenfactory/v1/tx.proto file receives formatting improvements, focusing on import statement organization and consistent field definition styling.

Changes

File Change Summary
cmd/minitiad/config.go Added srvCfg.InterBlockCache = false to disable inter-block caching
go.mod - Removed github.com/cosmos/iavl v1.2.2
- Added github.com/cosmos/iavl v1.2.4
- Updated multiple dependencies and replace directives
proto/miniwasm/tokenfactory/v1/tx.proto - Reordered import statements
- Standardized field definition formatting
- Adjusted RPC method signature formatting

Poem

🐰 In config's realm, a switch so neat,
Caching blocks now take a backseat
Dependencies dance, versions align
Protobuf styling, looking so fine
A rabbit's update, clean and bright! 🔧


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d3584c and f7aeed6.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • cmd/minitiad/config.go (1 hunks)
  • go.mod (2 hunks)
  • proto/miniwasm/tokenfactory/v1/tx.proto (10 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • proto/miniwasm/tokenfactory/v1/tx.proto
🔇 Additional comments (4)
cmd/minitiad/config.go (1)

44-44: Verify the performance impact of disabling inter-block cache.

Disabling the inter-block cache may impact performance for repeated queries and increase disk I/O. Please ensure this change aligns with the performance requirements of the application.

go.mod (3)

Line range hint 261-277: LGTM! Security improvements in dependency replacements.

The replacements address known security vulnerabilities:

  • Replacing deprecated jwt-go with maintained golang-jwt/jwt/v4
  • Fixing upstream vulnerability in gin-gonic/gin

279-284: Verify compatibility with the updated indirect dependencies.

The update to iavl v1.2.4 and cometbft-client v0.1.1 may introduce breaking changes.


Line range hint 286-294: Verify the custom fork compatibility.

Using custom forks of cometbft and ibc-go requires careful version management. The pinned gRPC version is a good workaround for the relayer issue.

✅ Verification successful

Custom fork compatibility verified successfully

The custom forks of cometbft and ibc-go are properly maintained and compatible. The pinned gRPC version (v1.65.0) is an appropriate workaround for the documented relayer issue. No compatibility issues were found in the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify custom fork versions and compatibility

# Check for version-specific code
rg "cometbft.*v0\.0\.0-20250109053429|ibc-go.*v8\.0\.0-20240802003717"

# Look for any grpc-related issues
rg "grpc\..*nil"

Length of output: 809


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any dependency-related errors or issues
rg -i "failed to|error.*dependency|incompatible"

# Check for grpc-related configurations
rg -i "grpc.*config|grpc.*option"

# Look for any imports of these custom forks
rg -l "github.com/initia-labs/(cometbft|ibc-go)"

Length of output: 74062


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the repositories exist and are accessible
gh repo view initia-labs/cometbft
gh repo view initia-labs/ibc-go

Length of output: 17291

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 64.38%. Comparing base (8a6a2e6) to head (f7aeed6).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #90   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   64.38%   64.38%           
=======================================
  Files          39       39           
  Lines        3229     3229           
=======================================
  Hits         2079     2079           
  Misses        972      972           
  Partials      178      178           

@beer-1 beer-1 merged commit b41cc8d into main Jan 15, 2025
10 checks passed
@beer-1 beer-1 deleted the chores/clear-deps branch January 15, 2025 00:58
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 4, 2025
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant