fix: audit #126
fix: audit #126
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new functionalities and modifications primarily related to cryptographic operations, particularly focusing on the secp256k1 algorithm for signature verification. New gas parameters have been added, and functions for verifying digital signatures have been implemented. Additionally, there are several formatting adjustments across various modules to enhance code readability without altering the underlying logic. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move (1)
100-103: Consider Enhancing Error Messages for Invalid Message LengthThe assertion checks if the message length matches
MESSAGE_SIZE, but the error codeE_DESERIALIZEmight not provide enough context. Consider providing a more descriptive error message or using a different error code to indicate an invalid message length.precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move (2)
94-94: Typo in documentation comment for theverifyfunctionThe documentation comment has a typo. It should read: "Returns
trueonly if the signature verifies on the public key and message."Apply this diff:
-/// Returns `true` only the signature can verify the public key on the message +/// Returns `true` only if the signature verifies on the public key and message
95-110: Consider validating lengths ofpublic_key.bytesandsignature.bytesIn the
verifyfunction, while you check the length of themessage, it would be prudent to also assert that the lengths ofpublic_key.bytesandsignature.bytesare as expected (COMPRESSED_PUBLIC_KEY_SIZEandSIGNATURE_NUM_BYTES, respectively). This can prevent potential issues if invalid data is passed.Apply this diff to add the validations:
assert!( std::vector::length(&message) == MESSAGE_SIZE, std::error::invalid_argument(E_DESERIALIZE) ); + assert!( + std::vector::length(&public_key.bytes) == COMPRESSED_PUBLIC_KEY_SIZE, + std::error::invalid_argument(E_DESERIALIZE) + ); + assert!( + std::vector::length(&signature.bytes) == SIGNATURE_NUM_BYTES, + std::error::invalid_argument(E_DESERIALIZE) + ); return verify_internal( message, public_key.bytes, signature.bytes )precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/nft.move (1)
367-370: Simplify collection address generationIn
generate_collection_object, you can simplify address creation using the existingcollection::create_collection_addressfunction directly.Consider refactoring as follows:
let collection_address = - collection::create_collection_address(creator_address, collection_name); + collection::create_collection_address(signer::address_of(creator), collection_name);precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/object.move (1)
247-247: Enhance documentation forcreate_nft_objectConsider expanding the documentation for the
create_nft_objectfunction to provide more details about its purpose, parameters, and usage, as it plays a crucial role in NFT creation.precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/object.move (1)
247-253: Consider Adding Unit Tests for 'create_nft_object' FunctionTo maintain code quality and ensure the new NFT creation functionality works as intended, consider adding unit tests for the
create_nft_objectfunction.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (19)
- crates/gas/src/initia_stdlib.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/natives/src/crypto/secp256k1.rs (4 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/block.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move (3 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/dex.move (91 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fa/fungible_asset.move (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/object.move (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/collection.move (0 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/initia_nft.move (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/nft.move (15 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/soul_bound_token.move (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/block.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move (3 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/dex.move (91 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/object.move (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/token/collection.move (0 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/token/initia_nft.move (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/token/nft.move (15 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/token/soul_bound_token.move (2 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (2)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/collection.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/token/collection.move
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/block.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/dex.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/fa/fungible_asset.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/block.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/dex.move
Additional comments not posted (54)
crates/natives/src/crypto/secp256k1.rs (4)
7-9: Necessary imports have been addedThe required items (
recover,verify, and cryptographic types) are now imported fromlibsecp256k1, ensuring that all cryptographic operations can be performed correctly.
38-40: Consistent addition ofread_pubkeyhelper functionThe
read_pubkeyfunction aligns with existing helper functions likeread_signatureandread_hash, promoting code reuse and consistency in data deserialization routines.
66-85: Confirm desired behavior when parsing failsWhen parsing the public key and signature, if parsing fails, the function returns
Ok(smallvec![Value::bool(false)]). Ensure that returningfalseis the intended behavior for invalid inputs rather than aborting the operation, aligning with the expected functionality of the verification process.To verify, you can check the specification or documentation to confirm that returning
falseis appropriate when deserialization fails.
206-209:native_verifyfunction registered correctlyThe
native_verifyfunction is properly registered in themake_allfunction, making it available as a native function under the name"verify_internal".precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move (2)
205-206: Handle Potential Errors from generate_keys FunctionThe
generate_keysfunction is assumed to always succeed, but if there's a possibility of failure, consider handling any potential errors it might return.Confirm if
generate_keyscan fail and whether error handling is necessary.
105-110: Ensure Proper Error Handling in verify_internalThe call to
verify_internalassumes that the native function will handle all errors internally. Confirm thatverify_internalsafely handles invalid inputs and doesn't panic, or consider adding error handling to manage any potential exceptions.Run the following script to verify that
verify_internalhandles errors appropriately:Verification successful
Input Validation and Error Handling Appear Sufficient
The implementation of
verify_internaland its usage seem to handle errors appropriately:
- An assert statement validates the message length before calling
verify_internal:assert!( std::vector::length(&message) == MESSAGE_SIZE, std::error::invalid_argument(E_DESERIALIZE) );verify_internalis declared to return a boolean, indicating it safely handles errors internally:native fun verify_internal( message: vector<u8>, public_key: vector<u8>, signature: vector<u8> ): bool;This design suggests that
verify_internalwill returnfalsefor invalid inputs rather than panicking. However, manual verification of the native implementation could provide complete assurance.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for error handling in verify_internal native function implementation. # Since the implementation is native, ensure that error checks are in place in the Rust code. # Expected: verify_internal should return false without panicking on invalid inputs. # Note: As we cannot inspect native code directly, verify that calls to verify_internal in the codebase handle return values correctly. rg --type move 'verify_internal' -A 5Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find Move files and search for 'verify_internal' with context fd -e move -x grep -n -C 5 'verify_internal' {} \; # Search for potential error handling patterns around 'verify_internal' fd -e move -x grep -n -C 5 'verify_internal.*assert\|verify_internal.*if\|verify_internal.*match' {} \;Length of output: 4634
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move (1)
172-178: LGTMThe declaration of the native function
verify_internalis correct.crates/gas/src/initia_stdlib.rs (1)
50-50: LGTM!The new gas parameter
crypto_secp256k1_per_sig_verifyis correctly added and aligns with the existing gas parameters for cryptographic operations.precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/nft.move (23)
34-35: Addition ofENOT_OWNERerror code enhances securityIntroducing
ENOT_OWNERprovides a specific error for unauthorized access attempts, improving error handling and security clarity.
99-101: Updatedcreate_commonfunction signature to includeownerparameterAdding
owner: &signertocreate_commonensures that ownership verification can be performed within the function, enhancing security by validating the caller's authority.
107-111: Ownership verification increate_commonfunctionThe added assertion correctly checks that only the collection owner can create NFTs, preventing unauthorized NFT creation.
143-144: Modifiedcreatefunction to includeownerparameterIncluding
owner: &signeraligns with the changes increate_commonand ensures consistent ownership verification in the NFT creation process.
150-151: Extractedowner_addressfor correct NFT associationObtaining
owner_addressfromownersigner is necessary for associating the NFT with the correct owner during creation.
155-156: Updated NFT creation to useowner_addressPassing
owner_addresstoobject::create_nft_objectensures that the NFT is correctly owned by the specified owner.
158-158: Adjustedcreate_commoninvocation with new parametersAdding
ownerto thecreate_commoncall maintains consistency with the updated function signature and ownership verification logic.Also applies to: 160-160
363-372: Addedgenerate_collection_objecttest helper functionThis new helper function simplifies collection object generation in tests, improving code reuse and readability in test cases.
373-402: Implementedtest_create_after_collection_transfertest caseThe new test verifies that NFT creation functions correctly after a collection has been transferred to a new owner, ensuring ownership checks are properly enforced.
391-392: Verified NFT creation by new collection ownerIn
test_create_after_collection_transfer,create_nft_helperis correctly called with the new owner, ensuring that only the collection owner can create NFTs after transfer.
409-409: Updated test to reflect newcreate_nft_helpersignatureIn
test_create_and_transfer, the call tocreate_nft_helper(creator, creator, ...)correctly passes the owner and creator parameters, aligning with the updated function signature.
462-462: Adjustedcreatecall withgenerate_collection_objectin testsUsing
generate_collection_object(creator, &collection_name)ensures the collection object used reflects the correct state in tests.
496-496: Consistent use ofgenerate_collection_objectintest_no_royaltyMaintains consistency across tests by utilizing the helper function for collection object generation.
519-519: Updated test helper usage intest_create_nft_with_invalid_token_idThe call to
create_nft_helper(creator, creator, ...)correctly conforms to the new parameter requirements, ensuring the test remains valid.
530-531: Corrected supply limit test intest_too_many_nftsThe updated calls to
create_nft_helperproperly test the collection's max supply enforcement after signature changes.
541-542: Ensured duplicate NFT creation is properly testedIn
test_duplicate_nfts, the updated helper calls verify that duplicate NFTs cannot be created, adhering to uniqueness constraints.
598-598: Adjusted NFT creation intest_burn_without_royaltyPassing
generate_collection_object(creator, &collection_name)ensures the correct collection is associated with the NFT in the burn test.
622-622: Updated NFT creation with royalty intest_burn_with_royaltyThe change ensures that the NFT is created with the appropriate collection object and royalty settings for accurate testing.
652-652: Modified NFT creation intest_burn_and_mintUsing the helper function for collection object generation maintains consistency and accuracy in the burn and mint test scenario.
666-666: Ensured correct collection usage in NFT re-creationAfter burning the NFT, the re-creation step correctly uses
generate_collection_objectto associate the NFT with the collection.
691-694: Updatedcreate_nft_helperfunction signatureAdding
owner: &signerparameter allows testing NFT creation from different owners, enhancing test flexibility.
697-698: Adjustedcreate_nft_helperto passownerparameterEnsures the NFT is created by the specified owner, aligning with the ownership verification logic.
715-717: Modifiedcreate_nft_with_mutation_refto use updated helperThe change maintains compatibility with the updated
create_nft_helperfunction signature, ensuring tests function correctly.precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/token/nft.move (8)
34-35: Definition ofENOT_OWNERerror code is appropriateThe new error code
ENOT_OWNERcorrectly represents the scenario where the signer is not the owner of the collection.
99-101: Updatedcreate_commonfunction signature enhances securityThe addition of the
owner: &signerparameter to thecreate_commonfunction allows for ownership verification, enhancing the security of NFT creation.
107-111: Ownership verification logic is correctly implementedThe assertion ensures that only the owner of the collection can create NFTs within it, which prevents unauthorized NFT creation.
143-144: Updatedcreatefunction signature aligns with ownership checksIncluding the
owner: &signerparameter in thecreatefunction aligns it with the updatedcreate_commonfunction and reinforces ownership validation.
373-401: Testtest_create_after_collection_transfervalidates ownership enforcementThe test effectively simulates transferring a collection to a new owner and verifies that only the new owner can create NFTs in that collection, ensuring ownership checks are functioning as intended.
691-698: Updatedcreate_nft_helperfunction to includeownerparameterAdding the
owner: &signerparameter to thecreate_nft_helperfunction ensures it accurately reflects the updatedcreatefunction signature and enforces ownership validation during NFT creation.
715-717: Updatedcreate_nft_with_mutation_refto use newcreate_nft_helpersignatureModifying
create_nft_with_mutation_refto call the updatedcreate_nft_helperfunction with theownerparameter ensures consistency and proper ownership checks.
150-156: Verify correct addresses are used in NFT object creationEnsure that
owner_addressandcreator_addressare correctly determined when creating the NFT object withobject::create_nft_object, to associate the NFT with the proper owner and creator.Verification successful
NFT object creation uses correct addresses - Verification successful
The
object::create_nft_objectfunction is called with the correct arguments:
owner_address(derived from the owner signer)creator_address(obtained from the collection object)seed(created using collection name and token ID)This implementation ensures that the NFT is properly associated with both its owner and creator.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `object::create_nft_object` is called with the correct owner and creator addresses. # Test: Search for all instances where `object::create_nft_object` is called. # Expect: The first argument should be `owner_address`, and the second should be `creator_address`. rg --type move --context 5 'object::create_nft_object\('Length of output: 87
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Display the contents of the nft.move file and search for object::create_nft_object cat precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/token/nft.move | grep -C 5 'object::create_nft_object'Length of output: 517
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/initia_nft.move (2)
16-16: ImportingCollectiontype enables type conversion.By adding
Collectionto the imports, the code can now perform the type conversion withobject::convert<InitiaNftCollection, Collection>, ensuring the correct type is used.
218-218: Type conversion ensures compatibility withnft::create.Using
object::convert<InitiaNftCollection, Collection>(collection_obj)properly converts the collection object to theCollectiontype expected bynft::create, ensuring type safety and correctness.precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/token/initia_nft.move (2)
16-16: ImportingCollectionenables type usage in the moduleThe addition of
Collectionin the import statement allows the module to use theCollectiontype, which is necessary for the changes made in themint_internalfunction.
208-218: Verify structural compatibility betweenInitiaNftCollectionandCollectionTo ensure that
object::convert<InitiaNftCollection, Collection>(collection_obj)is valid, verify whetherInitiaNftCollectionstructurally containsCollection.Run the following script to check if
InitiaNftCollectionincludesCollectionas a field:If the pattern does not match, it indicates that
InitiaNftCollectiondoes not containCollection, and the conversion may not be valid.precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/object.move (3)
31-31: Verify the necessity of thefriend initia_std::nftdeclarationThe addition of
friend initia_std::nft;allows theinitia_std::nftmodule to access private members ofinitia_std::object. Please confirm that this access is necessary and that it doesn't expose internal implementation details unnecessarily, which could lead to tight coupling or potential security issues.
248-248: Confirm the visibility modifierpublic(friend)The function
create_nft_objectis declared aspublic(friend). Ensure that this is the intended visibility level and that only friend modules should access this function. If broader access is required, you might need to adjust the visibility accordingly.
249-251: Potential issue with object address derivationIn
create_nft_object, the object address is derived usingcreate_object_address(&creator, seed);. Verify whether using thecreatoraddress is appropriate for generating the NFT's address. If the NFT's uniqueness should be tied to theowneror if different behavior is desired, consider adjusting the parameters.precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/object.move (2)
31-31: Confirm Necessity of 'friend minitia_std::nft' DeclarationAdding
minitia_std::nftas a friend grants it access to the private members ofminitia_std::object. Ensure that this access is necessary and that it doesn't introduce unintended security risks or tight coupling between modules.
251-251: Ensure Adequate Entropy in Seed for NFT Address GenerationThe object address for the NFT is derived using
create_object_address(&creator, seed). Verify that theseedprovides sufficient entropy to ensure the uniqueness of each NFT and prevent potential address collisions.precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/soul_bound_token.move (4)
9-9: Approved: Import ofCollectionIncluding
Collectionin the import statement is appropriate and necessary for its usage in type conversion within the code.
206-206: Approved: Renamed parameter enhances clarityRenaming the parameter from
collectiontocollection_nameimproves code readability by clearly indicating that the variable represents the name of the collection.
218-218: Validate type conversion usingobject::convertConverting
collection_objfromSoulBoundTokenCollectiontoCollectionusingobject::convertassumes compatibility between these types. Ensure that this conversion is valid and that all necessary fields are correctly transferred, preventing potential data integrity issues.To verify the compatibility of these types, you can run:
Verification successful
Type conversion from SoulBoundTokenCollection to Collection is valid
The conversion using
object::convertfromSoulBoundTokenCollectiontoCollectionis valid and safe. Here's why:
SoulBoundTokenCollectionis a superset ofCollection, containing all fields present inCollection(creator, description, name, uri, nfts).- The conversion is from a more specific type to a more general type, which is typically safe in object-oriented design.
- Both structs have the
keyability, which is crucial for object conversion in Move.This conversion effectively "downgrades" a
SoulBoundTokenCollectionto a regularCollection, preserving all necessary fields while discarding additional functionality specific to soul-bound tokens.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the definitions of `SoulBoundTokenCollection` and `Collection` for compatibility. # Display the struct definitions rg --type move -A 15 $'struct SoulBoundTokenCollection' precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/soul_bound_token.move rg --type move -A 15 $'struct Collection' precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/collection.moveLength of output: 412
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the correct file paths echo "Searching for soul_bound_token.move file:" fd -t f soul_bound_token.move echo "Searching for collection.move file:" fd -t f collection.move # Display struct definitions echo "SoulBoundTokenCollection struct definition:" fd -t f soul_bound_token.move -x cat {} | grep -A 15 "struct SoulBoundTokenCollection" echo "Collection struct definition:" fd -t f collection.move -x cat {} | grep -A 15 "struct Collection"Length of output: 3739
214-214: Ensure the collection exists before usageWhen retrieving the collection object using
collection_object, it's important to verify that the collection actually exists. Without this check, attempting to use a non-existent collection could lead to runtime errors.To confirm that collections are properly checked for existence, you can run the following script:
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/token/soul_bound_token.move (2)
206-209: Parameter rename enhances clarityRenaming the parameter from
collectiontocollection_nameimproves code readability by explicitly indicating that the function expects a collection name (String) rather than a collection object.
218-218: Validate type conversion compatibilityConverting
collection_objfromSoulBoundTokenCollectiontoCollectionusingobject::convert<SoulBoundTokenCollection, Collection>(collection_obj)assumes thatSoulBoundTokenCollectioncan be safely converted toCollection. Ensure thatSoulBoundTokenCollectionis compatible withCollectionto avoid type safety issues.You can run the following script to confirm the compatibility:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move (2)
172-183: Document the return value and add a security note.The documentation for the native function
verify_internalshould include:
- A description of the return value (
trueif the signature is valid,falseotherwise).- A security note about the importance of using a secure hash function to generate the message hash.
Apply this diff to improve the documentation:
/// Returns `true` if `signature` verifies on `public_key` and `message` /// and returns `false` otherwise. /// /// - `message`: A 32-byte hashed message. /// - `public_key`: A compressed public key in bytes. /// - `signature`: A 64-byte ECDSA signature. + /// + /// # Security Note + /// + /// The `message` should be a cryptographically secure hash of the original message. + /// Do not sign the message directly to avoid malleability attacks. native fun verify_internal( message: vector<u8>, public_key: vector<u8>, signature: vector<u8> ): bool;
Line range hint
1-227: Consider adding a constant-time comparison function.To prevent timing attacks, it's recommended to use a constant-time comparison function when verifying signatures or MACs.
Consider adding a
constant_time_eqfunction to compare byte arrays in constant time:/// Compares two byte arrays in constant time. /// Returns true if the arrays are equal, false otherwise. fun constant_time_eq(a: &vector<u8>, b: &vector<u8>): bool { let len_a = std::vector::length(a); let len_b = std::vector::length(b); if (len_a != len_b) return false; let mut result = 0u8; let i = 0; while (i < len_a) { result |= (*std::vector::borrow(a, i) ^ *std::vector::borrow(b, i)); i = i + 1; }; result == 0 }Then update the native
verify_internalfunction to useconstant_time_eqfor comparing the recovered public key with the provided one.precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move (3)
172-183: Consider adding documentation for the nativeverify_internalfunction.While the function is documented with parameter descriptions, it would be beneficial to provide more details about the expected behavior, error conditions, and any assumptions made. This can help future maintainers understand the function's purpose and usage more easily.
Line range hint
1-283: Consider adding test cases for edge cases and error conditions.While the existing tests cover the basic functionality of the
verify,ecdsa_recover, andecdsa_recover_compressedfunctions, it would be beneficial to include additional test cases for edge cases and error conditions, such as:
- Testing with empty messages or signatures.
- Testing with messages or signatures of incorrect lengths.
- Testing with invalid recovery IDs for the
ecdsa_recoverandecdsa_recover_compressedfunctions.These additional tests can help identify potential issues and ensure the functions handle unexpected inputs gracefully.
Line range hint
1-283: Consider adding documentation for the module and its key components.While the code is well-structured and follows good naming conventions, adding documentation can greatly improve the understandability and maintainability of the module. Consider including:
- A high-level overview of the module's purpose and functionality.
- Detailed documentation for each public function, explaining its behavior, parameters, return values, and any preconditions or postconditions.
- Explanations for the constants and their significance.
- Any important assumptions or limitations of the module.
Good documentation helps other developers understand and use the module effectively, reducing the likelihood of misuse or errors.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move (3 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/object.move (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/collection.move (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move (3 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/object.move (2 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/token/collection.move (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/object.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/token/collection.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/object.move
Additional comments not posted (8)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move (2)
94-110: LGTM!The
verifyfunction is implemented correctly:
- It checks that the message length matches the expected size.
- It calls the native
verify_internalfunction with the correct arguments.- The function signature and documentation are clear and accurate.
205-226: Great test coverage!The
test_secp256k1_sign_verifyfunction thoroughly tests theverifyfunction:
- It generates a key pair and signs a hashed message.
- It verifies that the signature is valid for the correct message and public key.
- It checks that verification fails for an incorrect message.
- It checks that verification fails for a corrupted signature.
This test provides good coverage of the success and failure cases.
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/crypto/secp256k1.move (3)
94-110: LGTM!The
verifyfunction is implemented correctly:
- It asserts that the message length matches the expected
MESSAGE_SIZE.- It calls the
verify_internalnative function with the correct arguments.- The function signature and return type are appropriate.
205-226: Great test coverage!The
test_secp256k1_sign_verifyfunction thoroughly tests theverifyfunctionality:
- It generates a key pair and signs a message.
- It verifies that the signature is valid for the correct message and public key.
- It includes negative test cases to ensure that verification fails for incorrect messages and signatures.
This comprehensive test coverage helps ensure the correctness and robustness of the
verifyfunction.
205-226: The previous comment suggesting the addition of negative test cases is no longer applicable, as the updated code already includes tests for incorrect messages and signatures.precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/token/collection.move (3)
537-538: Rename the parameter for consistency and clarity.The parameter name has been updated from
tradertoreceipient, which better reflects its role in the function. This improves the readability and maintainability of the code.Also applies to: 554-554
558-562: LGTM!The test function remains unchanged and continues to validate the expected failure condition when creating a collection with an invalid name.
Line range hint
1-662: Verify the impact of removing transfer safeguards on object transfers.The code changes indicate that the lines responsible for generating a transfer reference and disabling ungated transfers have been removed. This simplification of the transfer process raises concerns about the security and integrity of object transfers.
To assess the potential impact, run the following script to search for occurrences of
generate_transfer_refanddisable_ungated_transferacross the codebase:If the script yields no results, it confirms that the safeguards have been consistently removed across the codebase. However, if there are occurrences, it indicates an inconsistency that should be addressed to maintain a coherent approach to object transfers.
Additionally, consider the security implications of removing these safeguards. Assess if there are alternative mechanisms in place to ensure the integrity and authorization of object transfers. If not, it may be prudent to re-evaluate this design decision and consider retaining or replacing the safeguards to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores