-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix waiting pending txs loop break logic #66
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes modify the Changes
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
node/broadcaster/broadcaster.go (1)
163-173
: LGTM! The labeled loop improves control flow clarity.The changes improve the code by:
- Making the loop exit point explicit with the
WAITLOOP
label- Providing immediate return when no transactions are pending
- Structuring the control flow more clearly
Consider moving the
len(pendingTxs) == 0
check before the loop to avoid an unnecessary iteration, though the current structure is also valid and maintains consistency with other exit conditions.+ if len(pendingTxs) == 0 { + return nil + } + WAITLOOP: for { - if len(pendingTxs) == 0 { - return nil - } - select {
Summary by CodeRabbit