Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix waiting pending txs loop break logic #66

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

fix waiting pending txs loop break logic #66

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

sh-cha
Copy link
Collaborator

@sh-cha sh-cha commented Jan 23, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved control flow in transaction loading method
    • Enhanced code readability and efficiency in handling pending transactions
    • Simplified loop exit conditions

@sh-cha sh-cha self-assigned this Jan 23, 2025
@sh-cha sh-cha requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2025 04:34
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes modify the loadPendingTxs method in the Broadcaster struct within the broadcaster.go file. The primary modification introduces a labeled loop (WAITLOOP) to improve the control flow when handling pending transactions. The code now provides a more structured approach to exiting the waiting state, with a clearer mechanism for returning when no pending transactions exist.

Changes

File Change Summary
node/broadcaster/broadcaster.go Added labeled loop WAITLOOP in loadPendingTxs method; modified loop exit strategy to handle pending transactions more explicitly

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Loop of Code Delight

Labeled loops, a programmer's might,
Breaking free with WAITLOOP's grace,
Transactions dance, no time to waste,
Cleaner code, a rabbit's embrace! 🚀

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Member

@beer-1 beer-1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
node/broadcaster/broadcaster.go (1)

163-173: LGTM! The labeled loop improves control flow clarity.

The changes improve the code by:

  1. Making the loop exit point explicit with the WAITLOOP label
  2. Providing immediate return when no transactions are pending
  3. Structuring the control flow more clearly

Consider moving the len(pendingTxs) == 0 check before the loop to avoid an unnecessary iteration, though the current structure is also valid and maintains consistency with other exit conditions.

+	if len(pendingTxs) == 0 {
+		return nil
+	}
+
 	WAITLOOP:
 	for {
-		if len(pendingTxs) == 0 {
-			return nil
-		}
-
 		select {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c7791a and e733737.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • node/broadcaster/broadcaster.go (1 hunks)

@sh-cha sh-cha merged commit c33ae5f into main Jan 23, 2025
6 checks passed
@sh-cha sh-cha deleted the fix/loop-break branch January 23, 2025 05:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants