Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 18, 2020. It is now read-only.

appveyor: bump OpenSSL to 1.0.2q, as build for 1.0.2p is no longer available #3892

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2018

Conversation

deepfire
Copy link
Contributor

Bump OpenSSL to 1.0.2q, as build for 1.0.2p is no longer available.

Type of change

  • 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • 🛠 New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🏭 Refactoring that does not change existing functionality but does improve things like code readability, structure etc
  • 🔨 New or improved tests for existing code
  • ⛑ git-flow chore (backport, hotfix, etc)

Developer checklist

  • I have read the style guide document, and my code follows the code style of this project.
  • If my code deals with exceptions, it follows the guidelines.
  • I have updated any documentation accordingly, if needed. Documentation changes can be reflected in opening a PR on cardanodocs.com, amending the inline Haddock comments, any relevant README file or one of the document listed in the docs directory.
  • CHANGELOG entry has been added and is linked to the correct PR on GitHub.

Testing checklist

  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

QA Steps

Screenshots (if available)

How to merge

Send the message bors r+ to merge this PR. For more information, see
docs/how-to/bors.md.

@deepfire deepfire requested a review from KtorZ November 23, 2018 14:29
Copy link
Contributor

@KtorZ KtorZ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds like... okay I guess ^^" ?

@deepfire deepfire merged commit b4f5ff7 into release/2.0.0 Nov 23, 2018
@deepfire deepfire deleted the csl-appveyor branch November 23, 2018 14:44
@KtorZ KtorZ mentioned this pull request Jan 4, 2019
12 tasks
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants