Skip to content

Node 10.6.0-pre updates #602

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Node 10.6.0-pre updates #602

wants to merge 14 commits into from

Conversation

@johnalotoski
Copy link
Contributor

@johnalotoski johnalotoski commented Jul 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

  • Consolidates non-forger and forger configs into a single configuration, with node handling any differences internally based on forger status (ie: PeerSharing, TargetNumberOfKnownPeers, TargetNumberOfRootPeers)
  • Includes peerSnapshotFile for all networks
  • Allows SRV records for bootstrap resource definitions
  • Adjust default networking mode to p2p without explicit declaration as the only mode for >= 10.6.0 is p2p
  • Bump minNodeVersion to 10.6.0 for default config changes

@johnalotoski johnalotoski force-pushed the jl/10.6.0-pre-updates branch 3 times, most recently from 094ef60 to f1da9c8 Compare August 12, 2025 20:30
@johnalotoski johnalotoski changed the title WIP 2025-07-25 Node 10.6.0-pre updates Aug 28, 2025
angerman
angerman approved these changes Aug 29, 2025
View reviewed changes
@mgmeier mgmeier mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2025
Open
@johnalotoski johnalotoski force-pushed the jl/10.6.0-pre-updates branch from bbdae50 to f3f5545 Compare October 14, 2025 18:19
@johnalotoski johnalotoski mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2025
Merged
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@angerman angerman angerman approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@johnalotoski @angerman @Russoul