filip(feat): docs site redesign

[fstoqnov-iohk]

Implemented new agreed on docs site designs

• New homepage
• Updated look and feel of nav and footer
• Tweaks to the docs/blog pages
• Minor adjustments to some of the markdwon components

[github-actions]

Test Results

    3 files  ±0    102 suites  ±0   16m 47s ⏱️ -30s
2 035 tests ±0  2 035 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
4 206 runs  ±0  4 206 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 1a51d2e. ± Comparison against base commit ea995a0.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[Alenar]

The site is pretty now, many thanks 🔥 🚀

I've made few comments but overall it's seems good !

I've seen two additional issues:

1. The close button on the announcement bar is dark on a dark background:
   
2. On both chrome and firefox the main page there's a horizontal scoll bar that appears, allowing to scroll out of bound, also in firefox if you keep scrooling using a scroll wheel either vertically or horizontally you can go out of bound easilly

Chrome horizontal scroll bar

Screencast.from.2025-06-20.10-23-26.webm

Firefox horizontal scroll bar

Note

only appear on large viewport

Note

You can see the vertical scroll bar changing size by a huge margin (going from large to small) at the same time that the horizontal scroll bar appear

Screencast.from.2025-06-20.10-28-42.webm

Firefox scroll wheel out of bound

Screencast.from.2025-06-20.10-26-01.webm

Not a bug, but from what I understand the base of the customized theme components in src/theme is the docusaurus-theme-classic code. this leaves me with a few open questions:

1. Will it make us harder to upgrade to docusaurus latest version in the future ? We may have to backport the modifications on the customized theme components to upgrade (note: docusaurus 4 is coming and will rework its CSS).
2. I see that the Copyright comment on all copied components have been removed, is this ok ? Won't this cause legal issues ?
   i.e. PrimaryMenu on the PR branch vs PrimaryMenu on docusaurus source

[jpraynaud]

Many thanks @fstoqnov-iohk for the good work! LGTM 🚀

I align with @Alenar comments, in particular those concerning the licensing/copyrights.

[Alenar]

LGTM, just a new error introduced in the latest changes.

[Alenar]

@fstoqnov-iohk We had a little hiccup with prettier this morning (cf #2601), can you rebase your branch on main and ensure that the CI / check step is green ?