Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pass max_length_time_axis instead of max_size #43

Conversation

mickvangelderen
Copy link
Contributor

Based on #41

Pass max_length_time_axis instead of max_size
Makes it so that the warning:

Setting max_size dynamically sets the `max_length_time_axis` to be `max_size`//`add_batch_size = .*`

will no longer be triggered by legitimate use of create_flat_buffer and
make_prioritised_flat_buffer.

@mickvangelderen mickvangelderen force-pushed the mick/pass-max-length-time-axes-instead-of-max-size branch from f3cad12 to 89cd3a3 Compare November 8, 2024 21:26
Makes it so that the warning:

```
Setting max_size dynamically sets the `max_length_time_axis` to be `max_size`//`add_batch_size = .*`
```

will no longer be triggered by legitimate use of `create_flat_buffer` and
`make_prioritised_flat_buffer`.
@mickvangelderen mickvangelderen force-pushed the mick/pass-max-length-time-axes-instead-of-max-size branch from 89cd3a3 to d085f09 Compare November 8, 2024 21:39
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Dec 10, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Copy link
Contributor

@SimonDuToit SimonDuToit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@SimonDuToit SimonDuToit merged commit 1352bfa into instadeepai:main Dec 10, 2024
2 checks passed
@mickvangelderen mickvangelderen deleted the mick/pass-max-length-time-axes-instead-of-max-size branch December 10, 2024 17:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants