-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Optional aggregation control #569
Conversation
@aulemahal let me know when this is ready for review - happy to take a look. I think this approach makes sense. |
@aulemahal - following up here, is this ready for review? |
Sorry, I haven't had time to put on this in the last days. I still need to merge the conflicts and to add tests. I may have time in the next few days! |
No worries - take your time! I just wanted to check in and see if I could help with anything |
Co-authored-by: Max Grover <mgroverwx@gmail.com>
This is finally ready for review @mgrover1 ! |
Here we go. While investigating the weird conditionnal, I realized that method was broken. Fixing it made me discover another deeper bug... So here we are with another implementation of the no-agg groups construction, which I believe is somewhat simpler. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this approach!!
Should be fixed by intake/intake-esm#569. Fixes #109
Change Summary
cat.esmcat.aggregation_control
is None.Related issue number
Checklist
I added a few tests, but maybe I should add more to test most of the normal operations with a catalog missing the aggregation control.