Remove mistakenly committed binary #1223
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
This is a pretty big binary to clone as part of this repo. |
gesellix
pushed a commit
to gesellix/terraform-provider-github
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2022
kfcampbell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2022
* Refactor out branches attribute from resource_github_repository and data_source_github_repository to data_source_github_repository_branches * Add link to docs * Update github/data_source_github_repository_branches.go Co-authored-by: mareksapota-lyft <msapota@lyft.com> * Add only_protected_branches in data source github_repository (#1162) This will allow to retrieve only the protected branches instead of the first 30. Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com> * Remove mistakenly committed binary (#1223) * Revert PR #1162 (#1224) * marek's suggestion + use v47 Co-authored-by: mareksapota-lyft <msapota@lyft.com> Co-authored-by: Bertrand Paquet <bertrand.paquet@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com>
kazaker
pushed a commit
to auto1-oss/terraform-provider-github
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 28, 2022
* Refactor out branches attribute from resource_github_repository and data_source_github_repository to data_source_github_repository_branches * Add link to docs * Update github/data_source_github_repository_branches.go Co-authored-by: mareksapota-lyft <msapota@lyft.com> * Add only_protected_branches in data source github_repository (integrations#1162) This will allow to retrieve only the protected branches instead of the first 30. Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com> * Remove mistakenly committed binary (integrations#1223) * Revert PR integrations#1162 (integrations#1224) * marek's suggestion + use v47 Co-authored-by: mareksapota-lyft <msapota@lyft.com> Co-authored-by: Bertrand Paquet <bertrand.paquet@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com>
avidspartan1
pushed a commit
to avidspartan1/terraform-provider-github
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
* Refactor out branches attribute from resource_github_repository and data_source_github_repository to data_source_github_repository_branches * Add link to docs * Update github/data_source_github_repository_branches.go Co-authored-by: mareksapota-lyft <msapota@lyft.com> * Add only_protected_branches in data source github_repository (integrations#1162) This will allow to retrieve only the protected branches instead of the first 30. Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com> * Remove mistakenly committed binary (integrations#1223) * Revert PR integrations#1162 (integrations#1224) * marek's suggestion + use v47 Co-authored-by: mareksapota-lyft <msapota@lyft.com> Co-authored-by: Bertrand Paquet <bertrand.paquet@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Keegan Campbell <me@kfcampbell.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This binary was mistakenly committed as part of #1162. I'm avoiding force-pushing right now as I don't want to disrupt a linear history for the project, though I can re-evaluate that decision if necessary.