Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: improve openssl checker #3569

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2023
Merged

Conversation

ffontaine
Copy link
Contributor

Update openssl pattern to catch version on 'exotic' library

Update openssl pattern to catch version on 'exotic' library

Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fabrice.fontaine@orange.com>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (cb3826d) 77.98% compared to head (af96df3) 78.28%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3569      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.98%   78.28%   +0.30%     
==========================================
  Files         763      763              
  Lines       11582    11582              
  Branches     1359     1359              
==========================================
+ Hits         9032     9067      +35     
+ Misses       2127     2097      -30     
+ Partials      423      418       -5     
Flag Coverage Δ
win-longtests 78.28% <ø> (+0.30%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@terriko terriko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@terriko terriko merged commit a255140 into intel:main Dec 12, 2023
@ffontaine ffontaine deleted the fix-openssl-checker branch December 12, 2023 20:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants