Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SYCL][E2E] Refactor Basic/built-ins/marray_common.cpp #12875

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

aelovikov-intel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel requested a review from a team as a code owner February 29, 2024 18:01
Copy link
Contributor

@steffenlarsen steffenlarsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure!

@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel merged commit 5ec9cce into intel:sycl Feb 29, 2024
11 of 13 checks passed
@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel deleted the refactor-marray-common branch February 29, 2024 23:44
aelovikov-intel added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
aelovikov-intel added a commit to aelovikov-intel/llvm that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2024
aelovikov-intel added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2024
…12877)

Unfortunately, can't do the same for `sycl::vec` tests because swizzles
can't be captured and a macro seems unavoidable. Also, this includes a
reworked version of #12875 that has
been reverted in #12887.

That also uncovered a bug in our `sycl::length` host implementation when
the project is compiled using GCC. I'm not sure if that's a GCC bug or
yet another instance of UB in `sycl::vec`/`sycl::half` implementation,
but the only option at the moment is to workaround, which I'm doing
here.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants