Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SYCL][Test] Add test for ABI-neutrality of sycl classes #14558

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 16, 2024

Conversation

againull
Copy link
Contributor

@againull againull commented Jul 12, 2024

It is difficult to understand how to detect all possible data members which can cross ABI boundaries and cause problems because of dual ABI issue. For now using this approach which covers most of the classes, more than currently covered by "sycl/test/abi/layout*" tests.
Current hits are in sycl::detail CG classes and subclasses (MFileName, MFunctinName, MKernelName and PipeName string data members). Even though I'm not sure if those cross ABI boundaries or not, I think we have to be conservative and fix those too.

Using -fdump-record-layouts-complete to get dump for all complete record types, see description in https://reviews.llvm.org/D104484 for details.

@againull
Copy link
Contributor Author

tag @bso-intel for awareness about current hits.

@againull againull marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2024 15:46
@againull againull requested a review from a team as a code owner July 12, 2024 15:46
@againull againull merged commit 3254bca into intel:sycl Jul 16, 2024
13 checks passed
smanna12 pushed a commit to smanna12/llvm that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2024
It is difficult to understand how to detect all possible data members
which can cross ABI boundaries and cause problems because of dual ABI
issue. For now using this approach which covers most of the classes,
more than currently covered by "sycl/test/abi/layout*" tests.
Current hits are in sycl::detail CG classes and subclasses (MFileName,
MFunctinName, MKernelName and PipeName string data members). Even though
I'm not sure if those cross ABI boundaries or not, I think we have to be
conservative and fix those too.

Using -fdump-record-layouts-complete to get dump for all complete record
types, see description in https://reviews.llvm.org/D104484 for details.
@againull againull deleted the abi_headers branch August 7, 2024 19:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants