Skip to content

Conversation

@alexbatashev
Copy link
Contributor

@alexbatashev alexbatashev commented Jul 23, 2021

sycl-sanitizer is a CLI tool to facilitate development of DPC++ applications. Currently sycl-sanitizer is capable of the following diagnostics:

  • USM pointer memory leaks. Report is generated at the end of program execution and contains location of leaked pointer malloc call.
  • Construction of SYCL buffers from device or shared USM pointer. The tool will abort execution of application if it attempts to create a buffer from device or shared USM pointer.
  • Construction of SYCL buffer from host USM pointer of smaller size, than buffer range. The application will be terminated.

Example usage:

sycl-sanitizer application.exe --arg1 --arg2

@alexbatashev
Copy link
Contributor Author

alexbatashev commented Sep 12, 2021

Tests: intel/llvm-test-suite#459
Depends on #4545 and #4494

sycl-sanitizer tool aims to help developers find memory leaks when
using USM pointers.
@alexbatashev alexbatashev marked this pull request as ready for review October 2, 2021 16:20
@alexbatashev alexbatashev requested review from a team, andykaylor and tovinkere as code owners October 2, 2021 16:20
@alexbatashev alexbatashev requested a review from s-kanaev October 2, 2021 16:20
@alexbatashev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smaslov-intel FYI
We can do a similar wrapper for PI trace collector

@keryell
Copy link
Contributor

keryell commented Oct 5, 2021

Cool stuff!

_ZN2cl4sycl7handler20associateWithHandlerEPNS0_6detail16AccessorBaseHostENS0_6access6targetE
_ZN2cl4sycl7handler20setStateSpecConstSetEv
_ZN2cl4sycl7handler22setHandlerKernelBundleERKSt10shared_ptrINS0_6detail18kernel_bundle_implEE
_ZN2cl4sycl7handler28setStateExplicitKernelBundleEv
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is ABI breaking change, isn't it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, it has been re-ordered

@alexbatashev alexbatashev requested a review from s-kanaev October 6, 2021 08:40
@alexbatashev
Copy link
Contributor Author

replaced with #5389

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants